In order to make the criminal proceedings go smoothly, the detention or arrest of criminal suspects by the relevant authorities according to law is called compulsory measures. The executor of compulsory measures must apply for compulsory measures against criminal suspects, otherwise it is illegal to execute compulsory measures. Criminal compulsory measures generally include: summons, bail pending trial, residential surveillance, detention and arrest. The object of application is criminal suspects and defendants, and it is not allowed to take compulsory measures against participants and outsiders.

Execution in court refers to a new execution mode in which the executed person, the executed person and the third party give evidence, cross-examine and identify in court on whether the executed person has execution ability and how to execute it, so as to execute or reach an execution settlement agreement in court or decide to take execution measures or suspend or terminate execution.

? Scope of application of public hearing execution: Public hearing execution is mainly applicable to the following situations: 1) Multiple creditors apply for execution against the same person subjected to execution. When multiple creditors apply to execute the same person subjected to execution, that is, execution competition often involves participation in distribution. In this case, the debtor's assets generally can't meet the requirements of all creditors, and it is easy for the parties to have differences on whether to distribute and how to distribute them, so that the parties can be justified in court. The final implementation plan is determined by the collegial panel, which is conducive to the court's implementation according to law. It is also conducive to avoiding misunderstandings between applicants, between applicants and executors, and between applicants and courts, and can really play a role in resolving contradictions and stabilizing society. 2) The person subjected to execution or an outsider raises objections to the subject matter of execution. Such cases often involve the protection of foreigners' legitimate rights and interests.

If the enforcement judge decides categorically whether the objection is established only on the basis of written materials without cross-examination and evidence proof, it is often difficult for the parties to accept the objection. Through the public hearing, the interested parties can give full evidence, cross-examine and authenticate in court, and clarify their views on the objection. Then the collegial panel can judge the objection according to the evidence provided by the parties, and truly protect the legitimate rights and interests of citizens, legal persons, other organizations and outsiders. 3) Need to change or add entities to be executed. In essence, the increase or change of the execution subject is the change of the judgment subject. Relatively speaking, the legal relationship is more complicated.