Virtue is closely related to knowledge. For example, the lack of a comprehensive understanding of events depends only on the virtues of personal values, such as forced donations, such as keyboard man, many of which are moral kidnappings, not virtues. The degree of understanding of social consciousness is directly related to your value judgment standard. A person's value judgment standard is wrong, and the so-called virtue can only be immoral.
Concession is a virtue. Debate material
Concession is a virtue on the premise that in the eyes of the transferor, what he gives is equally cherished and scarce.
There is a very reasonable saying, it depends on whether a person cares about you, how much time he spends on you if he is rich, and how much he spends on you if he is poor.
this is reflected in one point, otherwise, you will only let yourself be irrelevant or cumbersome, and there is no virtue.
debate on whether Ma Weiwei concession is a virtue
123456789
debate on whether Ma Weiwei concession is a virtue
concession is a virtue, but it is not an obligation. It's a kind of mind, but it's not the capital demanded by others. < P > I don't know why I feel a little sorry for Saddam! ~？
birds are dying, and their songs are sad.
How to get the results of script execution in C program under Linux
Debate with popen
Is it a bad habit to be a good teacher in the international Chinese star contest
As the ancient saying goes, "Three people must learn from each other" and what is a "teacher"? "preaching and teaching to solve doubts." People say that "being a teacher" has a good reputation, and that "being a good teacher" is not shameful. As the saying goes, honest advice is hard to listen to, good words are not believed, words are not beautiful, and human feelings are often more pragmatic. Those words that don't sound very pleasant to the ear may have some practical results if they are really listened to. That's what I heard, and it's from someone I can't get any closer to, so I thought of being a saint and saving myself for three days; Although I am over the age of knowing my destiny, I believe this statement must be good.
How do you feel about the debate on whether dinosaurs vs. zombies are a virtue?
This is the topic of the 14-year Chinese debate competition, and there are other debate videos on Aasland Debate Network.
In today's society, should we inherit the traditional virtues of thrift? Debate the debate of the conference. More than 6, < P > it is said that people nowadays like to make festivals and are required to be good at making festivals. For example, Halloween on November 1, Singles Day on November 11, I don't know when it was formed, and Valentine's Day on February 14, which was originally a festival for foreigners, is now hot in China; Another example is Chinese Valentine's Day on the seventh day of July, which was not a festival originally, but now it has become Valentine's Day in China. Nowadays, people are keen on this festival and that festival, which undoubtedly gives businesses one business opportunity after another, so businesses like "festivals" more. But there seems to be a day when no one pays attention to and publicizes it, the media does not publicize it, and businesses don't care, because this World Day is contrary to their pure pursuit of interests. This day is October 31st every year-World Diligence Day. A reporter from a newspaper made a random survey, and the result was that nine times out of ten people didn't know there was a "World Diligence Day". The following excerpts show whether we still need to be thrifty today:
How can we throw our former virtues into the trash can when we are not completely out of poverty?
The results of the survey on "World Thrift Day", which is almost unknown, are embarrassing. But look at it from another angle ... What's the practical significance if only some formal activities are held on the day of the festival?
In today's increasingly rich material life, the values of the younger generation have undergone profound changes compared with those of the older generation. Some young people often laugh at the frugality of the previous generation, thinking that the purpose of life is to enjoy and the purpose of making money is to consume. Therefore, the shocking actions of "showing off the rich man" using 1 yuan to smoke cigarettes and "gold digger" showing off the villa sports car frequently broke out. (This has something to do with the excessive promotion of the so-called "earning and spending" and the excessive promotion of overdraft consumption of credit cards. This phenomenon is due to the wrong guidance of some industries and some media. )
Under the current background of the times and economic conditions, thrift does not make people "economically abstinent", nor does it make people feel indifferent to material things. Normal consumption is necessary, and occasional luxury can also improve the quality and taste of life, but it is by no means a deliberate waste, which breeds the wind of profligacy.
Some rich people in the world are extremely rich, but they never waste or show off their wealth. Li Ka-shing, the richest man in Hong Kong, lives a simple life in his poems. If the leather shoes are broken, mend them before wearing them. A suit can last for ten or eight years. Warren Buffett has not changed his house since 1958. And some of our upstarts spend more than 1, yuan on a meal, comparing who owns villas, luxury cars and luxury goods. Compared with these "stingy" tycoons, don't they feel ashamed? For 5, years, thrift has been our virtue. How can we throw our former virtue into the trash can when the country is not completely out of poverty? It is said that China has become a big country of luxury consumption in the world. Is this really in line with China's actual national conditions? Excessive consumption of luxury goods is a trend that is not worth catching up with. )
The rapid economic development gives people an illusion that material is infinitely rich (Ningbo)
No matter how excellent human creativity is, resources are always relatively scarce and limited. ..... Today's rapid economic development gives people an illusion that material is infinitely rich, just like marine resources once gave people the same feeling-inexhaustible. Actually. Since the middle of the 2th century, due to the rapid development of marine fisheries, marine living resources have declined rapidly, and many traditional fish species are on the verge of extinction or even disappearance. .....
Indeed, the rapid economic development has greatly enriched material products, but at the same time it has accelerated the consumption of limited resources. It is said that the United States alone consumes 7 million barrels of crude oil a day. If this is extended to the whole world, to one year, two years and ten years, people cannot help but feel frightened. Even if human beings find alternative energy sources, they will still consume other limited resources.
although China is vast in territory and abundant in natural resources, compared with the population of nearly 1.4 billion, the resources we have are actually stretched. And look at a set of data: China's per capita arable land is less than 42% of the world's per capita; China's per capita fresh water resources are only 1/3 of the world's per capita level; The per capita resources of coal, oil and natural gas in China only account for 55%, 11% and 4% of the world average. China's per capita mineral resources are only 58% of the world's per capita level; The forest coverage rate in China is less than 14%, and the per capita forest area only accounts for 11.7% of the direct average level ... < P > If a country's economy is to develop sustainably, thrift is an essential strategic choice; If a family wants to develop sustainably, it should also keep its thrifty heirloom, otherwise it can't escape the trap of "being rich for three generations".
behind the appearance of material prosperity, we should be timely. ......