Let's start with the previous answer. Personally, I feel that his answer is a bit taken for granted. I have several friends who are currently working in banks and have securities or futures qualifications, but none of them have part-time jobs in securities firms or futures companies. Banks generally don't allow this kind of part-time job. So don't think about it for the time being.

Let's go back to your question itself. I read your other questions. It should be a job seeker who wants to work in a bank. In fact, I think many people have asked you this question and I have answered it many times. I don't mind talking again. From the actual effect, the qualification certificate of securities and futures has no direct effect on entering the bank. After all, it's just an entry exam at the qualification level, and the specific business content is still very different from that of banks (although they both belong to the financial industry, they are not the same thing after all). At least all kinds of bank recruitment I have seen do not regard securities or futures qualification as a direct recruitment requirement, which is not as practical as accounting qualification certificate. Some banks require tellers to have accounting qualifications. As far as my personal experience is concerned, the qualification of securities and futures is only the icing on the cake for banking practitioners at most. As for wanting to work in a bank by this, it is not realistic.

In fact, like "Does it work?" Like, "Is it hard?" In my opinion, they are the most meaningless questions. I once went to a national joint-stock commercial bank to apply for a financial manager. When the interviewer saw that I was qualified for securities and futures, he said, "I have a lot of certificates, which are not bad." Then he spent a lot of time to determine how my marketing ability was and how many customer resources I could bring. The same person I interviewed ended the interview in less than 5 minutes because he promised to bring at least 1 100 million deposits to the bank immediately. In the end, he and I both got the offer, so do you think it is useful or useless for me to have these two certificates? Of course, the example I gave may not be applicable to you, but it should also explain some problems. I can only tell you that banks are not so easy to enter and the competition is fierce. In this case, it is always good to try to increase your chips. It is better not to use it after the exam than to use it without taking it out. Don't hate it when you use it, especially because you don't have any considerable social resources behind you But don't be superstitious about certificates, especially this kind of introductory certificate with low gold content. To tell the truth, there are more people taking the securities and futures qualification examination now. ...

Say a few more words. Nowadays, many people like to ask "Is the XX exam useful?" Personally, I feel a little too utilitarian It is best to have a great certificate and choose all kinds of good jobs as soon as you take the exam. This certificate does not mean that there is no such certificate. For example, at present, there is no CFA, the best certificate in the global financial industry. If you pass the third level, many people will go to Wall Street. But to be honest, this kind of exam is really not easy. So someone asked something like "Is the XX exam difficult?" The best thing is high gold content and low difficulty. How can there be such a good thing? ...