Examine/consider carefully the questions to be answered or the topics to be written.
? Given data 5? In the end, the Q County Party Committee revoked the inner-party punishment against Zhang. Please draw up an "information bulletin" in the name of Q County Committee to respond to social concerns. (20 points)
Requirements: the format is correct, the content is comprehensive and targeted, and it does not exceed 400 words.
According to the routine inspection steps: 1. Answer the task and grasp the verb-object structure, that is? Drafting a "briefing"? , belongs to the official document, because on behalf of the government image, standing on the government's point of view, the style of writing is more serious, so we should pay attention to the rigorous wording. 2. Data range, you can answer this question by reading data 5. 3. Answer the requirements. If the format is correct, it consists of three sets: title, text and signature. The title is "Information Bulletin", the text is all from the original materials, and the signature is Q County Committee of the Communist Party of China and the year, month and day. The content is comprehensive, that is, the answer is required according to the raw materials. Targeting refers to responding to the problems existing in the materials in order to respond to social concerns. The word length should be controlled at about 4 00 words.
Introductory songs (Tanci (Tanci) and some local operas)
At the beginning, the background or purpose of writing will be directly defined. This report is not the first report, but the second report based on the results of the first treatment. In order to prevent netizens from seeing this briefing for the first time, it is necessary to briefly summarize the results of the first processing, but it is forbidden to directly extract the original text of the first briefing from the materials, or even expand it more specifically. There are two main reasons. One is that the government issues a document and extracts it directly. Second, the focus is not clear. The focus of the article is not the explanation of the first case, but the handling of the re-investigation results. So simply explaining the situation, telling the basic identity of the protagonist, the summary of the incident and the handling results have aroused public concern, so it is enough to re-investigate this matter.
main body
The data emphasizes the investigation and handling of the incident, so the article focuses on the investigation and handling. The public and professors have sharp words, and even rise to the deep level of respecting personality rights. Many students will borrow it without thinking, but they still return to the position of examining questions and need to maintain the image of the government. The government did have excessive behavior in the previous treatment, but should it be upgraded to personality right as the professor said? If so, what does this make the government face? Therefore, the problem should be stated, but the wording should be well grasped, and only the problem should be characterized as improper handling and inaccurate characterization.
final result
Combined with the context, we can see that there are two completely different treatment results for the same incident, and combined with our own experience, we will inevitably think that this means that we should be more cautious and meticulous in our future work. In order to echo the beginning, the reason for re-investigating this matter is because the media people are concerned, so the end can echo the media people's friends to continue to supervise, so as to enhance the scientific and effective government work.