Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Futures platform - Is the third futures investment analysis exam difficult? How does it compare with the first one or two? Off topic?
Is the third futures investment analysis exam difficult? How does it compare with the first one or two? Off topic?
It seems that the difficulty of thinking has not increased, and the weight of calculation questions has not increased, but the understanding of knowledge points has been emphasized. The typical problem is that the calculation difficulty is reduced. A considerable part of the answers given are not the calculated results, but the calculated formulas. So the difficulty level is still there, but it's not as BT as the second time.

In this topic, single choice also introduces a short piece of material corresponding to two or three questions like comprehensive questions, but these questions are very detailed knowledge points. There are still some questions that seem to be posted on a K-line chart, but the answers are not found on the chart, but summarized from the knowledge points.

Of course, there is also the problem of BT. There is a topic about rating agencies. It's actually quite simple. I just asked which two agencies downgraded this time, but the answer was to give you the LOGO of the four companies for you to choose from. If you only read books, you will have no choice.

There are longer and longer English reading questions.

Generally speaking, I feel that the understanding and application of knowledge points will be the trend in the future. It should be useless to memorize books in the future. Read the book first, and then do more questions later.

Finally, more and more political problems are coming. The examination time is September 17, and there is even an event on August 10 in the title. These things should not be difficult for employees, because people usually make a fuss about a trivial weather factor, but they will pay more attention to the contents of the book in the future and the analysis will be more standardized.