Ms. Li works in China Bank. Because she spoke for the victims of crude oil treasure, she was transferred to the water room (tea room) next to the bank elevator, allowing her to go to the toilet and eat, but she was not allowed to leave the water room during working hours. As soon as she goes out, the people in the security department will take her back, which puts her under great psychological pressure. Every day's work is to summarize and study, and there are no other specific matters.
Not only that, she was expelled from the bank last month on the grounds that she deliberately damaged the camera. This reason was recognized by her. But she thought that the camera was specifically aimed at her, and as long as she was at work, she was transferred to her position. She reflected it, but it didn't help at all, so she cut the camera line.
When she was in the Bank of China, the leader commented that she was eating the rice of the Bank of China and smashing the pot of the Bank of China. The punishment for her should be true. It takes about a month to put Miss Li in the water room. After one month, she was dismissed. Miss Li believes that this is because the monitoring can only be kept for one month, and it will be covered after this month. After the report, there will be no evidence, so she was fired.
She graduated from a famous university and is still a master's student. In her first month in the bank, she was still an excellent employee. When she took out the award at that time, she could see that she was really excellent. Since she spoke for some people, her fate has changed dramatically, which she didn't expect. For such behavior, netizens think that this is deliberately targeted by the company leaders. Now there is no monitoring to prove Miss Li's rhetoric, so she dares to blatantly dismiss her and let her not say it.
Now the Bank of China has indicated that it will investigate this matter, but there will be no violation of employees' privacy. Who do you think is right?