For stock recommendation, the CSRC has clearly stipulated that it can only be carried out by institutions with securities consulting licenses. However, now, on various social platforms, illegal and marginal stock recommendation advertisements emerge one after another.
As an investor, we should be careful about the stock recommendation made by legal institutions with securities investment consulting licenses.
For example, some hot money that likes short-term speculation will use popular concepts to operate stocks. Some hot money, after obtaining speculation information through the interaction of listed companies, conspired with relevant consulting institutions to push tickets. When investors see the recommendation, they are actually shipping hot money. This kind of risk is great.
If you look at the stock recommendation of some institutions, you will find that many recommended companies have empty concepts and blindly follow the trend after using retail speculation.
For example, in the early blockchain companies, the outside world blew new lake treasures, and retail investors took over when they bought them, with huge losses.
As an investor, we should also be careful of securities companies blowing tickets, which is more risky.
ST Xinwei fell 18 times after the Thunder. However, on August 30th, 1965, at 438+06, an analyst in soochow securities sent a research report, full of admiration for Xinwei Group and honey worship for its chairman Jing Wong. It is really commendable that any company can adapt to the rise of a big country and always step on the thunder so accurately.
In fact, LeTV, Stormwind Technology and Kangdexin are explosive companies, aren't they recommended by many brokerage analysts? Which is not a star stock? Purchased by the fund?
Over the years, in my experience, I have met many analysts of big securities firms, who visited the company and recommended countless extremely bad stocks that exploded afterwards. I wonder if they have received the benefits of listed companies or are they really that bad? Or did you set me up on purpose?
My conclusion is that the seller's report can hardly refer to the stock purchase, and their key reports will only be provided to key public offering customers, while small institutions and the public will see unimportant reports and reports preparing for shipment.