Is the risk assessment questionnaire of investment and financial institutions scientific? What's the difference between conservative and radical? In fact, everyone has the habit and idea of investing and managing money, because after all, everyone's money is very limited, and it is human nature to think of some ways to earn more income in the case of limited money. Because most people in this world are not very rich, they all try their best to get money. Among them, the risk assessment questionnaire of investment financial institutions is feasible in theory and relatively scientific. But it may be different from the expectations of the general public, because the theory and estimation are limited to specific situations and conditions. In fact, there are many differences between moderates and radicals.

Difference 1: Steady and radical are two ways to invest and manage money. Cautious people tend to put a small amount of idle funds in it. This kind of financial management often has the characteristics of low risk, low interest rate and low income. This kind of investment is often suitable for investors who are willing to take less risks. These people may have a relatively small income, but they hope to get some income. Moreover, their characteristic is that they tend to invest conservatively. Aggressive investment methods are often more suitable for users with relatively high income and a lot of idle funds and assets, so you can consider such investment options. High risk and high return, after all, wealth and risk are the truth.

Therefore, these two financial management methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, which also requires us to carefully identify and select the appropriate financial management methods and carefully combine the appropriate financial management methods. You can invest some money in radical financial management and invest a sum of money in sound financial management. Based on the principle of not putting all your eggs in one basket, you can effectively avoid risks in this way. Although they are completely different ways, we still need to find a good combination point. This is a very important matter. Because in line with the principles of respecting differences, understanding individuality, carefully combining, carefully avoiding risks and pursuing the maximization of investment returns, it is reasonable to reduce the risk coefficient by combining.

So I think there is no difference between the two, but the combination of income and risk is different, which can be viewed in a more reasonable form.