In the process of reviewing manuscripts, it is often found that many people have not done their work well, but their expressions are not good.

In this case, it is still necessary to express it more clearly, otherwise it is easy to do badly and the report is not sufficient. In other words, the research object should be reliable and representative. If there is something wrong with the topic itself, there is basically nothing to see later. There must be something wrong with the data, let alone reliable results.

We often encounter some articles with excellent data, large sample size and good representativeness, but there are various problems in the analysis.

Evaluating whether a simulation result is correct depends on whether the trend, simulation and measured trend can be correct. Because of this coincidence, the final result may be within the standard control range, but the trend line is wrong.