Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Futures platform - What are the differences between Soros, Rogers and Buffett in their investment methods?
What are the differences between Soros, Rogers and Buffett in their investment methods?
Buffett, Soros and Rogers are famous traders in commodity stocks, foreign exchange and futures respectively. Which of them has the highest investment skills? First of all, Soros and Rogers are profitable on the basis of highly leveraged transactions, while Buffett relies more on the scale and low cost of funds. On the one hand, his method of making money lies in his unique vision of stock selection, on the other hand, he has a strong investment style of pursuing safety with insurance funds. Buffett's long-term investment is inseparable from the characteristics of insurance funds. Insurance funds are a business that pursues long-term balance of payments, and long-term investment and long-term funds are matched. Insurance funds do not ask for merit but ask for nothing. As long as the investment in the stock market is safe and stable for a long time and higher than the premium of the insured, the insurance funds will win. Even Buffett himself admits that the best operating benefit is not the fund he manages, but the insurance company he manages. The main profit point of Buffett's business value chain lies in insurance, and its business model is a compound growth model of insurance+value investment. Knowing this will help us understand Buffett's investment skills. Buffett should not only pay attention to investment, but also to the operation of insurance companies, because there are two concerns, so he is bound to be distracted.

Soros and Rogers used to be partners. When they were at loggerheads, the quantum fund had the best return, which exceeded that of Peter Lynch and Buffett in the same period. (1970, Rogers and Soros jointly founded the Quantum Fund. During his ten years in Quantum Fund, the compound income of Quantum Fund was as high as 37%, exceeding Buffett's 29% and Peter Lynch's 30%. ), it's really hard to say which of them has higher investment skills. However, their fame stems from high-leverage trading, which is closer to the essence of investment than low-leverage trading: the former needs a balance between risk control and profit growth, and a slight carelessness may lead to overall losses. Jesse David Livermore went bankrupt four times in his memoir "Stock Handwriting", and Gann, a master of technical analysis, also lost to highly leveraged trading. Who can profit from highly leveraged trading for a long time, who is the real king of the investment community.

Highly leveraged trading is becoming more and more complicated, futures and spot hedging, options and futures hedging, options are too complicated derivatives. The belief circulating in the futures trading market is: the market is always right, don't go against the trend. Because high leverage magnifies the risk, it is necessary to judge the trend, time window and fluctuation range extremely accurately. But the fluctuation of the market is uncontrollable, and most traders choose the strategy of following the market. Soros put forward the theory of reflexivity. He believes that because investors' market blindness is often wrong, traders should make use of market errors to trade. Reflexivity theory is the basis of Soros's foreign exchange trading. Rogers used value investment in the futures market, mainly trend trading. He often sees the long-term value growth trend of a commodity and then carries out medium-term operation. Because the foreign exchange market is too grand and complicated, and the operation is more difficult, it is difficult for Soros to become the market leader as in the 1990s. Rogers predicted that there would still be a bull market in the commodity market in the future. I think Rogers may still be in the forefront of the times in the 2 1 century, especially as he is the most optimistic about the economic future of China among the three traders. Another characteristic of Rogers is that he travels around the world. He is more active than Buffett. Although Soros has a grand vision, some of them are high above him, while Rogers set foot on every land where investment opportunities may appear on his own feet. I am more optimistic about Rogers, but Soros's investment in HNA shows that he has unlimited potential, and he sometimes plays the role of an equity investor.