If the return is successful, it is unjust enrichment, and the consequence is that the seller sues for the return. Unjust enrichment refers to obtaining benefits at the expense of others without legal basis. In this kind of behavior, those who gain benefits are called beneficiaries and those who suffer losses are called victims. So there is a debt relationship between the beneficiary and the victim. The beneficiary is the debtor and the victim is the creditor. The seller can call the police directly, and the police will come back with a courier. Don't be lucky.
legal ground
According to Article 25 of Chapter III of the Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests, if an operator sells goods through the Internet, television, telephone, mail order, etc., consumers have the right to return the goods within seven days from the date of receipt, without giving reasons, except for the following goods:
(1) was ordered by the consumer.
(2) Fresh and perishable.
(three) digital products such as audio-visual products and computer software downloaded or unpacked by consumers online.
(4) newspaper delivery.
In addition to the goods listed in the preceding paragraph, other goods that are not suitable for return according to the nature of the goods and confirmed by consumers at the time of purchase are not returned without reason. The goods returned by consumers shall be in good condition. The business operator shall refund the commodity price paid by the consumer within seven days from the date of receiving the return. The return freight is borne by the consumer; Unless otherwise agreed between the operator and the consumer, such agreement shall prevail.