The divorce agreement stipulates that the house belongs to the woman, and the woman compensates the man. Now that the house price has fallen, the woman doesn't want to compensate at the agreed price. What should I do? Lawyers believe that the real intention of both parties in the division of real estate is to share equally, which is also the general principle of divorce property division. Obviously, it does not meet the real wishes of both parties when signing the contract, and it is unfair to the party that has not obtained the house. According to the contract law, if a contract is in obviously unfair, it can be modified or terminated. In addition, it is also appropriate for the party who has obtained the house to bear certain compensation for the breach of contract that it has not paid in time. Therefore, when the house price falls, the other party should be compensated according to half of the new house price.

There are many such cases, and the court will re-evaluate the house price before sentencing.