Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Futures platform - How do futures clearance courts generally decide?
How do futures clearance courts generally decide?
According to the specific circumstances of the case. Experiencing a position refers to the situation that there is a huge loss in the futures account, resulting in negative assets. At this time, investors not only lost all the money in their accounts, but also owed some money to the futures company.

Investors must pay off the money owed to the futures company, otherwise, the People's Bank of China will include the outstanding investors in the credit record of the capital market. Secondly, the futures company will bring a lawsuit to the court, and if it has not paid back the money, it will be included in the list of people who have lost their trust in the country. After that, the daily life of investors will be affected, such as not being able to buy train tickets and plane tickets, not being able to stay in some star-rated hotels, and even being restricted in many aspects such as employment and tourism.

According to the second paragraph of Article 36 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Futures Dispute Cases, if the customer's trading margin is insufficient and the margin is not added according to the time agreed in the futures brokerage contract, it shall be handled according to the agreement in the futures brokerage contract; If the agreement is not clear, the futures company has the right to forcibly close its open futures contract, and the losses caused by forced liquidation shall be borne by the customer.

Paragraph 2 of Article 38 of the Regulations on the Administration of Futures Trading stipulates that "when the customer's margin is insufficient, it shall add the margin in time or close the position on its own. If the customer fails to add the margin in time or liquidate the position by himself within the time specified by the futures company, the futures company shall forcibly liquidate the contract of the customer, and the relevant expenses and losses arising from the forced liquidation shall be borne by the customer.

Paragraph 2 of Article 33 of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Futures Dispute Cases stipulates that if the client's trading margin is insufficient, the futures company fulfills the obligation of informing, the client fails to add the margin in time, and the client requests to reserve the position and reaches a written consensus, the losses caused during the period of reserving the position shall be borne by the client; The loss of warehouse penetration shall be borne by the futures company.

Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Futures Disputes Article 2 When trying futures contract disputes, the people's court shall determine the liabilities of the defaulting party in strict accordance with the agreement of the parties to the contract, unless the agreement of the parties violates the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations.

Article 3 When trying futures infringement disputes and invalid futures trading contracts, the people's courts shall determine the civil liability of the party at fault according to whether the parties are at fault, the nature and size of the fault, and the causal relationship between the fault and the loss.