0 1 true British FCA direct permission: none of your business.
FXPRO Pratt & Whitney claims that the British FCA straight-through license (STP) is still under supervision, indicating that it is still effective supervision.
In Puhui official website, we can know that Puhui Exhibition holds three licenses, namely, British FCA license, Puhui Cyprus CYSEC license and Bahamas SCB license.
Obviously, the three licenses are held by three different companies under Pratt & Whitney. FXPRO Pratt & Whitney was established in 2006, and obtained STP license from FCA in the UK on 20 10. It was also verified in FCA official website that the license is still under supervision, and the company's signature is FXPRO UK Limited, which is consistent with the information in official website.
In particular, Pratt & Whitney holds the STP license of FCA in the UK. The licenses of FCA can be divided into four categories: full license, EEA license, AR license and payment license. Under full license, there are only two subcategories that are really supervised by FCA: MM license and STP license, and these two subcategories also enjoy the protection of FSCS.
It can be seen that the STP license held by Pratt & Whitney still has enough gold content, but in February 2065438+2008, 65438+2008, the British FCA announced that it would permanently reduce the leverage of foreign exchange to less than 30 times. Such a low leverage constraint cannot meet the needs of most investors, so Pratt & Whitney distinguishes the supervision of accounts according to leverage. The following is Bian Xiao's answer to Puhui's customer service.
It can be seen that Pratt & Whitney is not vague and clearly stated that it can be opened under the supervision of FCA in the UK. However, we still need to determine whether Xiapuhui's FCA regulatory license has been "actually used".
In its regulatory information, the registered website is www.fxpro.co.uk, and the input will jump to. com。 However, according to previous complaints from Pratt & Whitney users, Pratt & Whitney also owns two domain names, www.fxpro.cn and www.cn-fxpro.com, which was confirmed by Pratt & Whitney's official customer service.
Through Pratt & Whitney's exposure desk and online public opinion, problematic China investors use Chinese websites to open accounts, which has nothing to do with www.fxpro.co.uk who holds FCA regulatory license.
Furthermore, as far as we know, there are three Pratt & Whitney companies holding three different licenses, namely, FXPRO UK LIMTED holds the British FCA license, FXPRO FINANCIAL SERVIES LTD holds the Cyprus CYSEC license, and FXPRO? Global market limited? Before obtaining the license of the Bahamas Standard Chartered Bank, Tian Yan had told everyone that the role of supervision can only take effect if an account is opened under a licensed company.
Pratt & Whitney's server in MT4 is signed by FXPRO FINANCIAL SERVIES LTD, not FXPRO UK LIMTED. It can be seen that most of Pratt & Whitney's China investor accounts are not under the supervision of FCA in the UK.
The China account opening website is inconsistent with the UK FCA regulatory registration website, and the server used by MT4 has nothing to do with FXPRO UK LIMTED.
To sum up, FXPRO Pratt & Whitney's British FCA license has a high gold content, but it has nothing to do with you!
Off-topic, although most traders are supervised by FCA in Britain, it is impossible for China traders to open accounts under FCA. First, because of the leverage restriction of FCA, it is impossible to carry out gold donation activities, and it is necessary to isolate customer funds from the platform's own funds, which also increases the difficulty for traders to manage China funds; The second is that most of the platform's collection accounts are blocked now, and the long-term and high-cost wire transfer will lose more users.
Furthermore, why not continue to discuss the regulatory licenses of Pratt & Whitney in Cyprus and Bahamas? The reliability of offshore supervision is really not comparable to that of mainstream supervision, and there are many disadvantages. As long as you know that the China account opened in Pratt & Whitney is not under the supervision of FCA in the UK, you will know why there are so many bad reviews in Pratt & Whitney.
02 conventional Pratt & Whitney non-compliance means: suspected customer loss
After understanding the most basic regulatory issues of Pratt & Whitney, let's take a look at Pratt & Whitney's foreign exchange transactions. After all, in addition to supervision, the safety of funds in the transaction process is also particularly important.
As a well-known British economist, FXPRO Pratt & Whitney was founded 15 years ago. After reading the forum of well-known foreign traders, Bian Xiao found that there are different opinions about Pratt & Whitney, but there is no principled comment. It can be seen that Pratt & Whitney's evaluation abroad is not bad. In recent years, Pratt & Whitney began to attack the China market on a large scale, and promoted it vigorously. Pratt & Whitney has been seen many times in the rankings of foreign exchange in Tian Yan at home and abroad, which shows that Pratt & Whitney has really invested a lot.
But in this way, the top supervisor, 15-year-old economic trader, has a poor evaluation in the major foreign exchange media in China. Of course, some customers complained about fake platforms, but the fact that there were customer complaints and evidence supported Pratt & Whitney's goodwill in the eyes of China investors plummeted.
On the one hand, it is the overwhelming publicity of Pratt & Whitney, on the other hand, it is the low evaluation given by the mainstream media. Who is wrong? Do you still remember an exposed article published in Tian Yan in September this year, entitled "The police have filed a case, but there are criminals involved in cross-border gambling in FXPRO Puhui! ! ! 》。
The victim started trading in Pratt & Whitney on 20 18. So far, four accounts have been exposed, with a loss of 920,000 yuan. Later, 80,000 cash withdrawals were successfully frozen by the police because the account was suspected of gambling crimes.
Because there is an agent's responsibility in the middle, it does not mean that the explosion is directly related to Pratt & Whitney. However, when users of the platform encounter this situation, they can only find the platform to find a solution at the first time. FXPRO Pratt & Whitney first ignored this matter, and then agreed to solve it under the pressure of public opinion, but then began to shirk responsibility, and then threatened that China was not bound by its platform.
Such behavior can't help but remind people of "eating guests". I consulted Pratt & Whitney's exposure desk and found that similar situations appeared more than once.
I sorted out the negative comments of the real general assembly, mainly focusing on the following points:
Eat customer injury;
MT4 is severely disconnected and stuck;
Profit erasure;
Such bad reviews have a great impact on Pratt & Whitney, which shows the seriousness of negative comments! However, Pratt & Whitney's attitude towards negative evaluation is also worth pondering. Not only is it not active enough to deal with the problem, but it is also ignored. After all, eating guests is also a taboo. As an investor who eats melons, it is easy to be taken away by the wind, thus losing investment confidence.
03 abstract
FXPRO Pratt & Whitney holds the full license supervision of British FCA with high gold content, and the platform qualification and strength are obvious to all. However, I hope investors will pay more attention to whether the account is under the supervision of FCA and ask the customer service clearly. However, this advantage is a bit "penny wise and pound foolish" in the case of low leverage and inability to give money.
Judging from the trading experience, Chinese people are not satisfied with Pratt & Whitney's evaluation. I entered the China market for two to three years, and was blacklisted for bad reviews, with poor performance. If the situation of "eating customers and losing profits" really exists all the time, investors are advised to stay away from Pratt & Whitney as soon as possible.