One,

He is first and foremost a book salesman. As long as I read his blog and Weibo, nine times out of ten, they all say: Please read Lang Xianping's book. Lang Xianping's popularity and exposure in the Internet and publishing circles are extremely high, and he tends to dominate the internet and book circles.

As a university professor, his arguments are extremely extreme, his language is extremely absolute, and his words are extremely vicious, all of which are unbelievable. Give a simple example. Recently, when he talked about the green leather cars of the Ministry of Railways, he strongly advocated that "green leather cars bring people back to a happy era" and that "comrades in the railway sector simply don't know what railway economics is".

China for decades, hundreds of thousands of experts, never can't solve the traffic problem. He easily said that the density of green leather cars should be increased by three times (he actually thought it could be increased by 30 times). Professor Lang's remarks can't help but remind people of "drinking mung bean soup to cure cancer" and the cult of "treating diseases and saving lives". Doctors all over the country are not as good at treating cancer as a Zhang Wuben; Industry can cure all diseases, and hospitals can close. If you listen to lectures on Zhang Wuben and cults, you may believe them more carefully. But just look at their conclusions and you will know that it is either cheating or doing evil. Professor Lang's theory of increasing the density of green leather cars is so simple and effective. This is not cheating or heresy. What else could it be?

Professor Lang is a doctor in business school and a learned scholar, but he is not a "railway economist" who boasts his expertise in a specific specialty. Does Professor Lang know that even if you are a doctor of railway economics, according to the general practice, doctors and professors are not allowed to design and construct directly. To put it bluntly, the reason is that the design and construction are far from the theory you brag about, and I am afraid that there will be problems in the project you design and construct. Having said that, Professor Lang's theory of "railway economy" can only give some leaders a popular science at best, but it is not on the railway blueprint. Professor Lang, however, said arrogantly, "Comrades in the railway sector have no idea what railway economics is.". We should know that the Ministry of Railways has not only one minister, but tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands of experts. I really don't want to believe Professor Lang's arrogance!

It is impossible for green leather cars to solve the traffic shortage in China. Professor Lang turned a deaf ear to this and even incited it with his own words: give half the money for the high-speed rail and let the people's green leather car fare be halved. Thus, "green leather cars have brought people back to a happy era." At this age, you still say that green leather cars bring people back to happiness. You don't treat China people like human beings. There is nothing shameful about riding a green leather car, but if we really say, "Green leather cars bring people back to a happy era". That's an insult to the people of China! Excuse me: Do you still make green leather cars? You are on the rich list of Chinese writers, and your books are sold everywhere. Is the packaging and pricing of books the level of green leather cars? Is your food, clothing, housing and transportation the level of a green leather car? As a rich writer in China, how much did you donate to buy green leather tickets for migrant workers? Speaking of safety, green leather cars and high-speed rail have had safety accidents at home and abroad; Speaking of saving money, walking is both safe and economical. Why are only green leather cars happy? The logical confusion makes people suspect that Lang Xianping, a professor who should be meticulous, has ulterior motives.

Professor Lang's performance on the green leather car is just the latest performance. In his book, China is either a loser, retarded or ignorant, or the people are poor and the government is corrupt and incompetent. He is sensitive to see that a group of superficial China people like to watch China jokes, so he caters to them and publishes a book. Later, Professor Lang's book was sold and China people were cheated. Later, Professor Lang appeared on the rich list of Chinese writers. Professor Lang: Are you from China? Are all foreign countries really good? Is China really useless? At least, you won't deny that China has an advantage: are China readers gullible? Lang Xianping is so nice! You sell it and count your money! ! !

Lang Xianping advocated with ulterior motives that wealth should be kept by the people. America is militaristic and heavily in debt. The total debt of the United States is $65,438 +04.3 trillion. Most of these national debts are the expenses of the war of aggression. Why didn't the United States hide the money among the people? The national strategy of the United States is to safeguard its international hegemony and thus enjoy some benefits of hegemony (such as the benefits of the US dollar as an international currency). China should also have its own national strategy. One of them is that the Ministry of Railways has replaced the green leather cars that have been made for decades and built high-speed trains. The United States invaded other countries, killed people and spent money. Why didn't Lang Xianping come to the United States to publish a book to promote people's prosperity? Obviously, Lang Xianping knows that these books can't be sold in America! However, Lang Xianping advocated that "green leather cars can bring people back to the happy times", instead of engaging in high-speed rail, saving money and storing wealth for the people. However, such books have a big market in China. It's incredible.

Second,

As we all know, wages in the Mainland are low and prices are low. However, Lang Xianping is mysterious. In the article "The Secret of Low Wages and High Prices in Chinese mainland", he opened his eyes and lied. Its argument is one-sided and absurd, and it is not worth refuting at all. However, I have to admire his insidious. He seized the sensitive topic of wages and prices and incited people with little knowledge to be dissatisfied with the government. The main idea of his article is as follows:

1. American hooligans bully all countries in the world, including China. Instead of scolding the United States, he insulted and laughed at the bullied China government. That's ridiculous.

China is far less wealthy than the United States, but Lang Xianping encouraged China to follow the example of the United States in implementing high wages and low prices. Everyone knows that the overall price level in the United States is definitely higher than that in China. Lang Xianping only knows that the prices of some commodities in China are higher than the mainstream. When it comes to prices and wages, it is inevitable to talk about the wealth of China. As we all know, China and the United States are not at the same starting line, but China has already surpassed German and Japanese, and ran to the second place. Lang Xianping turned a deaf ear to this and remained silent. Lang Xianping, a self-proclaimed economist, don't you know that the prices and wages of various countries are restricted by their historical and realistic conditions, and the horizontal comparability is poor? Comparing vertically, China has got rid of the dilemma of 1960 and 10 Cultural Revolution. Why did Lang Xianping do this? There is only one explanation: Lang Xianping attracted the attention of some superficial China people by exposing the shortcomings of the current government in China, and published a bad book. Plunder a lot of page fees from readers in China.

Third,

There are many talented people and great men in China. The current government and its think tank are far more knowledgeable than you and me. More importantly, they are implementing the basic national policy of "keeping a low profile" put forward by the great Deng Man Xiaoping. However, Lang Xianping used people's national complex with ulterior motives to encourage angry youths to take back the South China Sea, Diaoyu Islands, Ryukyu Islands and Outer Mongolia unconditionally by force, otherwise they would be labeled as weak traitors. This can't help but remind people of the Sino-Japanese War. The hawks were excited all over the country, but the result was treaty of shimonoseki, which ceded territory and paid reparations. By the way, this is the most expensive treaty in China's history-it shows the Japanese's greed. Shouldn't hawks reflect? Why not wait until the Qing government is ready to fight?

Fourth,

Lang Xianping accused the China administration of many shortcomings. First of all, tell Lang Xianping that this is not the dereliction of duty of the government, but the dereliction of duty of some officials. The government strictly forbids personal corruption. As we all know, the shortcomings of China officials also exist in other countries, but to different degrees. There are two reasons why corruption in China is deeply rooted: one is the long history of China culture, and the other is the economic history and present situation of China. This is very difficult for Lang Xianping, who is impetuous and superficial in academic attitude and eager for quick success.

In a sense, China culture revolves around the word "face". China boasts itself as a "state of etiquette". The so-called dignity of being a teacher, doing my best for friends, repaying every drop of water and honoring ancestors ... Who would have thought that these proud qualities are just incompatible with the legal system. In order to honor the corruption of ancestors, for friends, teachers and gratitude, cover up and condone corruption. Some people may not be allowed to denigrate China culture, saying that it is because Chinese mainland's legal system and democracy are not perfect, which leads to corruption. We know that under the current multi-party system in Taiwan Province Province, why are there huge corruption cases involving Chen Shui-bian and the judges of the High Court? Judge Zhou Zhanchun acquitted Chen Shui-bian? There is only one explanation: Taiwan Province Province and the mainland have the same roots and the same culture. There are also corruption cases in Korea, the Philippines and Thailand, which are deeply influenced by China culture?

The second reason is that China's history and current situation lead to corruption, which should be well understood. Since industrial revolution in europe, China has lost the pride of "China", but has become more and more poor, backward and ignorant. After ten years of catastrophe during the Cultural Revolution, China was on the verge of collapse. After the reform and opening up, China officials who were afraid of hardship and yearned for western life were corrupted.

Some people say that another reason for corruption in China is the nature of enterprises. They believe that private enterprises embezzle private money, just like robbers and thieves; Public enterprises are state and collective money. Corruption is not stealing, but taking it. If you don't take it, you are a fool. I said otherwise. Why there are state-owned enterprises in Europe and America, and the inefficiency is obvious, but there are not many corrupt people. This shows that the nature of the enterprise is not the main reason.

As mentioned above, the corruption of officials in China is not caused by the government, and the China government has been working hard to combat corruption. Therefore, Lang Xianping's accusation against the government of China is unfair and insidious.

When Lang Xianping interviewed Guo Meimei, she changed her previous style of ruthlessness, arbitrariness, catching shadows and treating the wind as rain. She said that she was less impatient and her tone became gentle. Plus the effect of bleaching Guo Meimei, Lang Xianping himself can't deny that his relationship with Guo Meimei's mother and daughter is really unusual. There is no doubt that Lang gave Guo Meimei such a big gift package, definitely to get Guo Meimei's return.

Lang Xianping should not think that the above conclusion has wronged you. You have been silent on all issues that are not Guo Meimei. Using the mask of doctor and professor to cover up the bad habit of speaking absolutely, being mean, and having extremely irresponsible views makes people unable to doubt that your views are wrong and your intentions are sinister.

Think about what you did. Even if Lang Xianping has an affair with Guo Meimei, he can't say anything.

What goes around comes around. Time is up.