If the moving average is used as a reference for intraday trading, first of all, we all know that the bigger the cycle, the more stable the trend, and the smaller the cycle, the easier it is to change, but the general trend is also a trend with a small cycle.
So I will look at the 1 hour cycle first when I do day trading. When the 1 hour cycle shows a trend, the market will continue, but for intraday trading, the 1 hour cycle lags behind. I use this cycle as a reference to judge the trend, not as a basis for entering the market. I'm looking to see if the trend is the same as or deviates from the 15-minute/hour cycle.
If it is the same, then this trend is undoubtedly accurate with great probability. If 15 minutes is a rebellious hourly trend, then it is necessary to adjust the same trend as the hourly cycle at 15 minutes, and consider opening a position near the support level or pressure level. I will choose to watch 1 minute or 5-minute K-line graph in the entry position.
Which cycle is the most effective? Looking at personal trading habits, I think a cycle is like a pool. There are small pools with small cycles and large pools with large cycles. How much water you fill, and how much space you need for intraday trading, you will see how big the cycle is. Every time a periodic signal appears, there will be room for profit in this cycle.
Which indicator is more effective? I don't think the basic indicators can grasp the trading signal at present.
I use my own characteristic indicators. The trend is clear at a glance, the support pressure is clear and the trading signal is accurate. The indicator I use is that the trading system of futures champions for many years is relatively mature and stable, and it feels good to use it personally!