I can only explain two ways separately, and everyone can judge for themselves.
Some people think that the short-term risk is high because the medium, long and short-term fluctuations are relatively small, so the risk is easy to control. But the fact is that many short-term speculators have incurred considerable accumulated losses in the process of fast-forward and fast-out. On the other hand, in the medium and long term, many short-term price jumps can be filtered, so from this perspective, the risk of a short-term transaction is less than that of the medium and long term, but the accumulated risk is higher, which requires traders to have considerable self-discipline.
Similarly, some people think that the medium and long-term risks are great. I see it this way. Long-term positions need a relatively large initial stop loss order, otherwise it is difficult for you to keep up with the trend, and the trend is not always there. In order to catch a trend, there are often many big stops. Therefore, from this perspective, medium and long-term positions are a great challenge to the patience and funds of traders.
My personal suggestion is that there is no standard answer to this question. You can try them all. Successful trading is adapted to the actual situation and personality of the trader. For example, Buffett's style is not suitable for everyone.
I suggest that when you operate, you should not judge by the profit-loss ratio alone, but by the following factors:
-Is your capital suitable for long-term investment?
-Do you want to hurry or slow down? You know, trading may be a lifelong career, and this problem will become more and more prominent with the growth of age.
-What kind of risk tolerance do you have?
Good luck.