Whether it is special or not in the last two days, the decline is a bit tragic, which directly triggered another debate on the short-selling mechanism on the Internet. Some people began to call for closing the short-selling mechanism, and also received some complaints one after another, saying that leveraged trading on trading platforms is harmful. It's all Man Cang. I can't live like this with my wife and children at home. They want the media to report and criticize the trading platform.

Think about what the masses think and worry about what the masses are in a hurry. Let's talk about it today.

background

After 4 15, five domestic trading platforms, such as Coinnet and O, issued a joint statement, stopping new financing and currency melting before 10, and stopping leveraged trading business after all financing or currency melting was paid off. At that time, the central bank really looked too closely, which was a last resort. A month later, Qianwang sneaked into Hong Kong and reopened leveraged trading. Of course, O is not a vegetarian either. Now it is highly leveraged and will be traded in futures.

Square view

Leveraged trading has always been one of the "slots" of currency trading platforms. In the eyes of supporters, shorting with leverage is a hedge. When the currency develops to a certain stage, there should be leveraged trading. The introduction of leveraged trading can restrain the sharp rise and fall, accelerate the formation of prices and strengthen liquidity.

Fan Fangguan Hall

Opponents believe that leveraged trading increases systemic risks and may even lead to "short positions" that harm the interests of bitcoin players. Opponents claim that there is nothing wrong with financing money, but they can open financing money without supervision and 100% reserve, which is too cruel to new things. In their view, this is because the currency has not yet reached that stage. At present, the trading platform is encouraging signs, which will accelerate the death of coins.

Some netizens even suggested these platforms: "Look farther, don't always stare at the pot (besides, there are fewer and fewer users in the pot), please look farther! We don't have many users playing with coins in China now. You are too eager to compete. Users only rotate on several platforms. They will not increase, but decrease, and there is not much meat in the pot. "

In fact, after all, they are not necessarily short-sighted, but because of competition. Xu Mingxing publicly responded that as long as other platforms stop financing money, they will definitely stop. Song Xiu, the currency of China, responded that "if everyone doesn't do it, we will also restore leverage, and it is interest-free leverage". It is conceivable that even if these big platforms give up, can futures give up? Will other platforms take this opportunity to open a short-selling mechanism to attract customers?

The short-selling mechanism is indeed a tool that a mature financial market should have, but sometimes the right thing may not survive, because everything must be market-oriented, with the right time, the right place and the right person.

If the market really has a large part of the demand to cancel the short-selling mechanism, then help Bian Xiao think that the trading platform should really pay attention to these needs. However, how many people support this market and how many people oppose it? It's hard to say for Bian Xiao. These should also be things that the platform should figure out.

Existence must be reasonable. There must be users who are opposed to shorting, and there are also users who support shorting. Time will tell whether leveraged trading is good or bad for funds.

By the way, those who lost in Man Cang have wives and children at home, so you still gamble in Man Cang? If you lose the bet, run out and denounce the platform. If you win the bet, will you send a small red flower to the platform? Willing to gamble and lose, zero is not worthy of sympathy.