The disadvantage of traditional warehouse locking and unlocking is that it always keeps the reverse order. Similarly, we can also use warehouse locking and unlocking to keep a future order. The idea is simple, but it is not easy to realize. For example, I made more orders at 5500, and I made some money at that time, and the price reached 5700. If I want to buy more orders in the low position, I will short the lock. At this time, more than 5500 and 5700 are held at the same time. I'll close 5700, see the pressure, and then lock the position. At this time, the price may have reached 6000, and I have more than 5500 left. If the price still exceeds 6000, then close 6000 empty orders and lock them at a higher height. By analogy, the purpose is to keep the low position and more orders. In fact, if you think about it carefully, it doesn't make sense. Generally, there will be some losses when it is flat, but it only increases the floating profit.

I've tried it before, and the final result is that I've always kept the price in the middle, but I also found that it's a little beneficial, that is, it's stupid, the general market breaks through a new high, and it's more likely to go unilateral. When the price exceeds my empty list price, I will close the position. If I don't break through, I'm unfair. This kind of operation can often earn some unilateral, but it will also miss many opportunities to fluctuate between long and short. But at least we have a deeper understanding of the form of lock warehouse. He can help us keep a list for a long time. We hope it is a profit order with a small number of orders or a large number of empty orders, not a serious reverse loss order. If the price drops from 5700 to below 5500, it will be flat and single, and the idea is the same.