It's a little fuzzy here. Entanglement theory has different explanations for deviation and retrogression, but I only talk about deviation in the popular sense according to my own analytical method. The trend of children entering the second hub and the trend of children leaving the second hub are identified as the same direction. If this comparison is biased, it is of great significance. Explain that there will be two situations in the future, consolidation or reverse movement. If this deviation is downward, this is a buying point. After buying, if consolidation should leave, if reversal, the target points to the last hub before leaving. The contrast between these two paragraphs is actually the first buying point of a certain level. The three buying points of correcting conclusions are relative and need to be understood. There was an article about the relativity of buying points in my space just now.

The comparison of deviation generally refers to two trends around the center. With the expansion of the center, the fluctuation points of the two centers overlap and the trend tends to be complicated. In theory, stocks with this trend should be avoided, because there is no trend, it is a shock. Technical analysis is most afraid of shocks, especially futures.

Generally speaking, deviation can be widely used. When consolidating and oscillating, you can compare the bands in the same direction, and even compare them in the positive and negative directions. You can compare the small bands in a big band, and you can also compare the bands in the trend. The role of deviation is huge, and the goal of adjustment is related to the previous wave of deviation of Dachuan. This adjustment area can even confirm whether the stock is strong or not. You can look at the daily and weekly deviation of the Shanghai Composite Index after its launch, and then look at the interval where 1664 is located, which will have great insight.