It seems a bit inappropriate to use the word "sitting in the village" in futures. Futures should use "forced liquidation" or "malicious operation". In my impression, sitting in the village means that they monopolize most of the goods and then let them change the price. It seems that the futures price is closely related to the spot price, and it is easy to be found if it is done too hard. It seems illegal to sit still in the village. Also, futures contracts have an expiration date, and they will be delivered in kind when they expire. After the stock has been sitting in the village for more than a year, the futures will expire. Also, the exchange has restrictions on positions. They want to divide tens of billions of funds and open many accounts. There are some attempts to control the market by taking advantage of capital. For example, the Sumitomo incident is similar to the stock market. But they are all from abroad and have never been heard of in China. For example, the Heinz brothers in the United States used funds to manipulate the price of silver, which was outrageous and was stopped by the government. The price of silver suddenly collapsed, and the Heinz brothers suffered heavy losses! How horrible! These situations are similar to sitting in the village. What do you mean by "attacking China for launching futures"? What did you say?/Sorry? You mean they want to stop China from launching stock index futures? What is good for them? There must be a master who knows. Wait for him to come.