Is there a contradiction between the two? No? You said details determine success or failure. That's right. It's like running a marathon on a piece of sand, and everyone's shoes are stuck in the sand. Some people keep running, while others stop to pour sand. Although he was temporarily behind, he soon caught up and won the first place. Because the people in front have sand in their shoes, their feet hurt after running for a long time, so they either barely jog or quit the race. It is the details that determine success or failure. There is nothing wrong with the success or failure of the strategy. In the 1980 s, Haitang washing machine used to have unlimited scenery. Because he first introduced Panasonic's washing machine technology, he quickly occupied the washing machine market in China. However, in the later strategic choice, Haitang's strategy of introducing washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner technology at the same time was not implemented, so it was quickly surpassed.

So details determine success or failure and strategies determine success or failure from different angles, which can also be said to be the same problem. A big strategy is a big detail. Just like the previous example, it can also be said that he carried out the strategy of "hiding his light and keeping a low profile" and coming from behind. Napoleon hit Russia because he didn't take into account the small detail that Russia would be very cold in winter, which led to a great defeat. It can also be said that his failure in the war was due to his thoughtlessness at the strategic level.