Naked K is the fastest index in technical analysis. If you don't look at naked K, I don't believe you if you want to say how your technical analysis is done. So people who know a little will simplify things, and naked K will be pleasing to the eye.
This is also the reason why Livermore despised Gann, a technical school. All kinds of rules that Gann said when he returned to Livermore after his death emphasized the importance of rules, but no longer mentioned technical analysis.
There are many ways and means of trading, and there is no qualitative difference in the result of a single one. Every tool has its limitations!
The best trading method varies from person to person, and it is related to the solidification of your trading system due to the observation of trading.
In the final analysis, except for ultra-short and ultra-high frequency, high probability traders are all morphological trend judgment plus naked K and indicators to provide signals for trading. Of course, pure fundamental traders are not included here.
Personally, I think senior traders prefer quantitative trading, but it is difficult to realize quantitative trading, especially there are procedures and naked K. All technical analysis methods are the same, but the division of labor is different. Some provide trend judgment and some provide trading signals. Naked K seems to have both, and futures and foreign exchange can be used. But there are thousands of stocks in the stock market, and that kind of tracking only two or three hundred so-called industry leaders by charts is also very cumbersome and annoying, and how many people are there for a long time?
Of course, we can also reduce our holdings in an efficient way, but we can seize the stocks that may be at the explosion point or experiencing a minute-long main increase through quantification and self-designed index sorting. Pure naked K can only be opened one by one according to the increase, so I think deep-seated traders don't like naked K analysis, let alone this. Only quantification can further improve the winning rate under the condition of technical analysis and integration.
Quantify? Looks like the holy grail? Unfortunately, there is no holy grail in the world, and if there is, it is not technical analysis! In fact, the holy grail may be your personal accomplishment and a little luck.
There are three stages in understanding EMA system: in the first stage, seeing mountains is mountains, and Gramby's EMA law is the foundation. After having some experience, I began to dabble in structural analysis. In the second stage, seeing that the mountain is not a mountain, I can cancel the EMA combination and look at the naked K. The purpose is to see the structure more clearly, and then go forward to understand the spiral law of the trend blooming like a flower, and have a new understanding of the EMA combination. It doesn't matter whether there is EMA or not, but there is no naked K EMA.
There is no such thing as naked K in any technical school. Only a fool would believe that watching naked k can make money steadily. Those who say that they can make money stably with naked K and mobile phones are idiots with unknown addresses. You believe they are two idiots themselves.
Without superior technology, we must study the fundamentals hard.
I don't trade stocks. . . I think naked k may be more influenced by the formula of senior traders. Of course, this formula is his personal subjective judgment, and it is an intuitive subconscious generated by long-term stimulation. When a gesture appears, he can predict the general trend by indicating the lag information through the K line, and basically does not run.
However, you can understand the general principles of financial risk control and the disposal strategy of national hot money, and you will know fairly well whether to stock.
You can compare the market ten years ago with the current market, and you will understand the truth.
I'm a rookie. Tell me what I see. I have contacted professional traders in some institutions. One of them is about 30 years old and manages 2 billion yuan. People also look at the K line directly. Why don't they use other indicators? I learned some knowledge about foreign exchange speculation from others. I was answered this question in class. People don't know where the moving average is without using other indicators, such as the moving average. If they don't use the moving average system, they will feel trouble. They give it to novices in class.
Deep traders prefer quantitative trading to naked K analysis. 10 years ago, the top 9 funds in western countries were all non-quantitative transactions, but today, 7 of the top 10 funds are only quantitative transactions, and the top 6 funds are all quantitative transactions. Quantitative trading has accounted for 50% of western trading volume.
Look at the characteristics of successful people at home and abroad.
Stock market and futures involve massive data, and the mathematical processing of data has inherent advantages.
In today's world, with the rise of big data analysis and artificial intelligence, mathematical models have become its core. Quantitative trading widely uses the above technologies, which belongs to the technical analysis of indicators and has become the mainstream trading mode of hedge funds, with American mathematician Simmons as its model.
10 years ago, among the top hedge funds in the world, only the last one was a quantitative transaction. At present, 7 hedge funds of 10 are quantitative transactions, and the first 6 are quantitative transactions. Simmons, a top American mathematician, founded four Renaissance companies.
Even Buffett, in fact, his mathematical thinking ability is also very strong.
In today's China, Wonder has selected the top three private equity funds in China. They are "Jiukun, Mingxun and Rubik's Cube". It is no accident that these three companies happen to be quantitative trading private equity funds.
Quantitative trading is trading with indicators, that is, building a mathematical model and testing historical data well. In order to make a firm deal, even historical data can't pass, so failure is a high probability thing. Subjective trading is 10 times more difficult than quantitative trading, which is more reliable.
Conclusion: The highest level of stock trading is "stable profit model of quantitative trading, with annual profit exceeding 65,438+00%, which is better than 20%, excellent maximum withdrawal control of risk control and strategic capital ability are also very important".
Buffett's annualized rate of return is about 2 1%.
That's a feeling! ! ! Commonly known as the sense of disk! !
Only price changes will cause all other changes, only price, others are caused by price, so what do you think should be studied?
Naked k, original flavor. The moving average and other indicators are artificially added with the so-called "law", which has certain reference. The real thing is to participate in the long-short game and mentality of related factors, and everything else is a start!