With the diversification and continuous promotion of TV programs, more and more cultural contents are involved, such as ancient poems and recitation programs, which present different sensory experiences for the audience and create a platform for many talented people to display. The most popular "Super Brain" has attracted people's attention since it was broadcast, and the competition system also makes people nervous for the players. So are these true? Is there really a big gap between the IQ of players and that of ordinary people? Some don't even understand the explanation.

The reason to doubt the authenticity of the program is because these players are really good. A problem in the field of mathematics may have been solved by scholars in a few minutes before the audience heard and understood it. This speed and accuracy is very surprising. So when I am amazed again and again, I wonder if this is the effect of the program. I sorted out the answers in advance and let the players answer them. Many people think it's a script.

As an audience, it is normal to have such doubts. After all, there are many scripts for the effect of the program, but who are the contestants of Super Brain? Gao Feisheng, from Tsinghua, Peking University, is a leader of famous foreign universities. The reason why these players can enter such a good school must be something extraordinary. They must have more knowledge in their heads than ordinary people. After all, Tsinghua is not accessible to ordinary people, so the audience has to admit that these students are very good, and their IQ is indeed higher than ordinary people academically.

You know, the ocean of knowledge is infinitely vast. Even if you have been studying all your life, you can't finish it. The questions in this program are of high quality, and many people who walk out of the classroom may not understand or have never heard of them.

The contestants who come to participate are all masters of famous schools. I'm afraid many people can't compare with their knowledge, and these students have been surrounded by various exams and theoretical knowledge. These questions are naturally handy.

However, it is not necessarily true that there is a big IQ gap between the audience and the players. The reason why the commentator can't understand it is because he hasn't studied it. Just as people who often repair cars don't know much about literature, literary and art workers don't know much about auto repair, and they specialize in it. The contestants on the show have their advantages, and so do ordinary people. Although their IQ may be different, they still live happily.

In a word, the super-brain program should be true, and the students are really good enough, but many people can't understand it because they haven't learned it. It is absolutely necessary to say that there is a big IQ gap. After all, everyone has his own advantages and advantages.