One is the big-name general class management software represented by SAP.
Including Oracle Bone Inscriptions, UFIDA and Kingdee. , characterized by the company's great reputation, strong strength, strong technical force and advanced design ideas, but the products belong to the general category and do not have the adaptability of the clothing industry. There are few successful precedents in the application of fashion enterprises such as clothing, shoes, leather goods, bags and cosmetics, and the price is expensive. There are only a few super-large enterprises in the clothing industry, and the main purpose is to value its reputation to match the scale of the enterprise, and form is more important than substance. This kind of software, Li Ning, Ba Jin and other application companies, basically only use basic application modules such as financial management and OA after implementation, and use other software or develop it by themselves in the management of specific businesses, which is a great waste. Some time ago, there was a hot article on the Internet-< <; Painted leather SAP>& gt objectively describes this phenomenon.
The second is the Shanghai style clothing management software represented by Yum! And Bojun.
Headquartered in Shanghai, backed by Jiangsu and Zhejiang garment industry, it has the advantages of product standardization, complete functions, large publicity investment, wide channel layout and simple operation and use, but it can't meet most individual needs of garment enterprises, and the price is very moist, especially in publicity. Like to exaggerate, for example, Yum! Known as the number one market share in China, Opal is known as the leading management software solution provider for clothing, shoes, hats and sporting goods industry in China, and Bojun is known as the best software provider in the information construction field of domestic clothing industry, both of which are "the first in China". It is difficult to distinguish between true and false, which is probably determined by the tradition that Shanghai culture is good at propaganda.
Third, Guangdong professional clothing management software represented by Xuner, Ross and Yishen (a good helper).
This kind of software is headquartered in Guangzhou, Guangdong people advocate talking less and doing more, paying attention to reality, so its products are the most practical, powerful, flexible in application, basically meet individual needs, with high success rate and moderate price. But at the same time, the advantages also bring disadvantages-the operation is more complicated, and enterprises must be equipped with professional IT management personnel for daily management and maintenance, otherwise the stability of the system may be problematic during application adjustment. After all, the operation of the system cannot be completely entrusted to the supplier. Among them, Xuner's advantage lies in distribution, Ross's advantage lies in production, and Yishen's advantage lies in synthesis and simple operation.
4. Small management software represented by Butler, Secret Olympics and Meiping.
Housewives are the general class, while the latter two are the special class. The characteristic of this kind of software is that it is cheap, and you can buy one set for several thousand yuan, but the function is quite simple, and you can only carry out simple inventory management. Small businesses can use it in a single clothing store, but larger ones can't. Some enterprises are in the early stage of development and are greedy for cheap. Once the number of franchisees reaches more than a dozen, many problems will arise and must be changed. Although thousands of dollars is not much, it is also a waste after all, and what is more fatal is to delay the development of enterprises.
On the whole, for the vast majority of small and medium-sized garment enterprises, the best way to ensure the successful implementation of the selected management software is to meet their current needs, promote enterprise development, and leave room for future growth is comprehensive selection, that is, UFIDA is selected for financial and OA management, and Yishen software or Yum software can be selected for garment integration, but Yum's water content is too high, so these software manufacturers can develop interfaces with each other, and data sharing and system compatibility are not necessary.