Since futures belong to investment products, it must be risky. Strict stop loss is the most direct and effective way to control risks. There is a maximum allowable loss degree whether it is short-term or long-term. It is a well-known truth for investors to lose money to a certain extent. There are several common stop-loss methods, such as: fixed stop-loss, stop-loss according to support resistance, stop-loss according to capital withdrawal, etc. The most annoying thing about a firm stop loss is that it often starts to reverse after a stop loss. Stop loss is at the top or bottom, and rises as soon as it is sold, which is the main reason why many people hesitate to stop loss. This kind of situation that has been swept away often appears in the market. Since the argument of strict stop loss is set, don't dwell too much on the problem of sweeping loss, because the situation of sweeping loss has been considered before making a stop loss strategy, and countless people are still struggling with the problem of sweeping loss. There is no answer here. I just want to tell you that the stop loss strategy should be strictly implemented.

As for locking positions, this kind of behavior is always confusing, but it is often used by many traders. Judging from the trading experience, I really can't find the benefits brought by locking the warehouse. In fact, the fundamental reason for locking positions is that investors are unwilling to dispose of the loss list. If it is the first time to lock the warehouse, the impact on the account will not be too great, and investors will not be wary, which is why so many people like to lock the warehouse. However, opening a warehouse is easier than unlocking, because if you want to unlock it successfully, you must ensure that your next two operations are 100% correct, otherwise the unlocking action will fail and the loss will exceed the original loss sheet. So here is a very strange question. Since the two actions must be correct when unlocking, why not find a better opportunity to ensure that the next two orders are correct after the stop loss, but think about the next two actions under unfavorable circumstances? If you have this ability, I believe this list will not go to the point where it needs to be locked!

Dead shoulder is a way of fund management. Many short positions are caused by deadweight, which can be solved by skilled traders, but thanks to their good deadweight. Dead shoulder is a classic and common trading technique, which comes from the support of statistical data. The data shows that 75% of quilt covers will be automatically untied within one week. 40% quilt cover will be automatically untied within two days. If the stop loss is frequent and the position is incorrect, the continuous loss caused by the stop loss will also be a problem. Change your mind, fight it, and you will come back soon. The most important thing is to manage the position. At this point, we want to emphasize to you. If you can't handle the position management well, don't die if the position is big. Remember! The basic principle of lifting the dead is to lift the dead in a light warehouse.

To sum up the above operations, the most reasonable and effective way is to strictly stop losses. Locking positions and dead bumps are all things that have to be done, especially when the position is too large and the market is not particularly clear. In the case that investors are not out or out, there is nothing but locking positions and dead support, so position management is also very important.