On campus, personal efforts also play a role, but what plays a bigger role is actually talent. The teacher doesn't ask you for material rewards. As long as you get good grades in the exam and have no serious personality problems, you will basically win the favor of teachers and get rewards in your grades. In this sense, the university is basically a "sage politics" or "elite politics" environment, more like a family, the evaluation system is basically decided by the teacher, and your intelligence is rewarded centrally.

Society is very different. Society is more of a place for exchange of interests, a market and "civilian politics". The main evaluation is not whether your intelligence is superior (although your intelligence and wisdom can still help you), but whether you can think of what others want. This standard is no longer determined by the center-teachers, but decentralized-determined by many consumers. Therefore, it was in the ninth year of fool melon seeds that the phenomenon of dropping out of school in the IT industry appeared, because "those who engage in missiles are not as good as those who sell tea eggs". This "upside down" is not perfect, but it just shows the market standard.

Human limitations-you can't expect generalist education or anything else to turn consumers into Qian Zhongshu or Nash. Therefore, our classmates should never bring the campus standards that they have been accustomed to for 16 years into the society intact, otherwise you will find that "Chu Jincai doesn't need it", not to say futures, but to turn it into cash. You can criticize it for being short-sighted, but it usually doesn't and has no obligation to wait for you to grow up and mature. It treats everyone who enters the society equally, no matter you just graduated and have no experience. If you miss an opportunity, you lose it; Unlike in school, you will be asked to make up the exam or make love to the teacher to change the score.