Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Futures platform - Why do some economists still think bitcoin is worthless?
Why do some economists still think bitcoin is worthless?
First, is he money?

If so, who will endorse him, that is, who will ensure his healthy and stable appreciation or depreciation. Obviously it is not the official currency endorsed by the government in human history.

If not, then those ups and downs are probably the same as financial products such as stocks or futures. However, it is still very different from other products in normal financial channels. No supervision, not attached to the real thing. In other words, you can't see his ups and downs or sideways at all. The so-called getting on the bus to make money is all luck. When I am old, I can't figure out why I get rich and why I lose my pants.

Because bitcoin is a financial product, and there is no external logic to calculate. Good luck, you are no different from a gambler.

Since it is gambling, smart people will maximize profits according to statistics, probability theory, psychology and so on. Be stupid, relax and live a good life.

It's worthless, just a chip in the casino.

Bitcoin has the silly value of delivering parcels, but it has no value as a self-proclaimed "coin".

The relationship between bitcoin and money, just like the relationship between seahorses and horses, lies only in the name.

At best, bitcoin is equivalent to frying garlic crazily, but it's still a little worse, because garlic can really be fried in a pot.

So, why do people still think bitcoin is valuable?

Stir-fry if you want, and you are too lazy to pursue such advanced things as value.