Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Futures platform - Oil futures loss
Oil futures loss
You can say that you have been cheated, or you can say that you have not been cheated.

(1) said he was cheated. Most of these exchanges are basically legal, all provinces have them, and they have been acquiesced for many years. Why do you say "foundation"? Because many years ago, the state publicly set the tone: only the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges, Shanghai Futures Exchange, Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange, Dalian Commodity Exchange, China Financial Exchange and China Gold Exchange directly under the jurisdiction of the People's Bank of China and the China Securities Regulatory Commission. These are legal exchanges. But in fact, n years ago, local provincial governments and some prefecture-level city governments also began to engage in various exchanges in the name of "financial innovation" encouraged by the state, all in order to make money. The middle countries have been cleaned up several times from time to time, and the rest are either acquiescent or new.

Then you signed various account opening contracts yourself. Legally speaking, the above terms are acceptable to you. So basically, you won't be cheated.

(2) It is not appropriate to say that you have not been cheated.

(1) Did it cost you more than 6 million yuan? Does the packaging given by his company look like all kinds of cattle X "teachers"? But it always loses money in business.

(2) Do "teachers" and account managers (salesmen) call you every day to hurry up or QQ?

(3) At the beginning, did you feel that the daily operation was very interesting, exciting and cool, and you were dreaming of making money every day?

Are the above three points all right?

Tell me something you don't know, or that you have been cheated. Why put quotation marks? Because people may not lie to you directly, but they just don't tell you anything. Just like when you go to a restaurant for dinner, the restaurant didn't tell you that the ham I gave you today fell on the ground, but stopped the water and picked it up for you without washing it. Do you think the restaurant lied to you?

For (1), these platforms are basically in the form of gambling transactions. What is a market maker? That is, no matter how much you want to buy or sell at any time, the dealer will accept all orders. In this way, the bookmaker has to bear great risks, and of course, there are risks and benefits. You made the banker's money and lost the banker's. There is nothing wrong with this transaction itself. /kloc-used in London gold trading 0/90 years ago to make up for the lack of liquidity. The gold bars sold by major jewelry stores in China and the "paper gold" and "paper silver" businesses of major Chinese prefix banks are all market makers and gambling. Can you say that ICBC's paper gold business is illegal because it is gambling? There is nothing wrong with gambling itself. The problem is that you don't know this, and you are still allowed to send military advisers (teachers, salesmen, business managers) under the command of counterparties and "enemies". Who loses if you don't lose?

As far as I know, there are only a few companies that don't want to make money from gambling pit customers, but I feel that there is about 10% in the industry, let's just say there is 10%. Only 10% of the companies are willing to spend money to ask truly skilled "teachers" to guide customers' transactions. The "teachers" employed by 10% companies may also be of uneven level, or in a bad state recently. There are few real experts, but there is a great demand in the market and industry. The growth and accumulation of talents is very slow, and the growth of talents in the industry can't keep up with the explosive growth of the industry. In this case, we can only ask for a drop first and then a drop. Anyone with a little experience of three to five months can be a "teacher". Finally, even if the lucky "teacher" is really an expert, customers/investors may not necessarily follow the guidance and suggestions. Everyone has their own emotions and temper, and insists on shorting. Some people look at heavy positions and bargain-hunting; Some gay men are bullish after drinking, so they short, thinking: Shit, I don't believe it will go up like this, and I don't believe in evil. ......

To sum up, there are always a few people who make money because of various complicated factors. Otherwise, where are the cases that earn several times to hundreds of times a year? Suppose everyone has a principal of 6.5438+million, and one person earns 6.5438+million, which means that 654.38+ 00 people lose all. Everyone wants to be one of the few people, but 6-7 minutes is destiny takes a hand, and 3-4 minutes depends on their own efforts.

For (2), psychological traps in trading and investment are everywhere, but only a few people don't know much about them. Psychologically, short-term trading is really more interesting and exciting. The previous interpretation of (1) is that one wants to fight and the other wants to suffer. You like short-term excitement and fun, and people try to satisfy you. Moreover, even if you don't like exciting and interesting short lines, people will try to guide you to do short lines. Because the salesman wants to make money and you don't trade, how can the salesman earn commission? Because companies and exchanges want to make money, why do they make mistakes more often when gambling? How to make money on gambling?

As for (3) why this market has developed in recent years, or because there are many demands and customers like you, it is interesting and exciting to seize and use customers' dreams of getting rich in the short term. How else can we support this industry for so many years?

Hehe, I haven't answered the question for a long time, so I wrote too much unconsciously.

If you are a big and open-minded person and have a clear and thorough understanding of these issues, I personally think it is best to blame yourself. You are the primary responsibility, others are the secondary responsibility. A man was introduced to a young lady and was arrested. Do you think the man or the introducer should be mainly to blame?