original text

Qiu Yi knows this country very well and is also an excellent player. Let Qiu Yi teach two people to play chess, one of them is absorbed, but Qiu Yi is listening; Although one person listened, he thought it was a swan, so he wanted to pay 6 for the bow and shoot it. Although it is a reference, it can be used for reference. Why is it wise? Pet-name ruby: No, it isn't. "

To annotate ...

(1) from Mencius Gaozi. Qiu Yi, the master of Weiqi at that time. Let's go and play Go. Qiu, your name. Because he is good at playing Weiqi, he is called "Qiu Yi". This is the habit of the ancients to curse.

(2) [through] the whole country.

(3) [Teaching] Teaching and guiding.

(4) Listen only to autumn, that is, "Listen only to autumn", and do exactly as the teacher says.

[I thought the swan was coming] I thought the swan was coming. Honghu Lake, Swan.

⑥ [I want to shoot it with a bow and arrow] I want to shoot the swan with a bow and arrow. Aid, bring it here. Pay, tie the raw silk to the arrow. The arrow has gone out and can be taken back by it.

Not as good as that dedicated person. Frodo, it's better, it's better. I mean the man who is dedicated.

Do you think this person's intelligence is inferior to that one? Because, through "calling", thinking. Yes, this man.

Pet-name ruby [not] is not the case. Sure, like this.

Attending Qiu Yi: Yiqi refers to the next period. There is a man named Qiu who is good at playing chess.

Honghu Lake: Goose and Swan.

5]: Together, together.

⒔ for is: for, with "said", said. Yes, here it is. So, that is to say.

And: modal particles, equivalent to "horse".

translate

Qiu Yi is the best chess player in the country. Let Qiu Yi teach two people to play chess, and one of them is absorbed and only listens to Qiu Yi. Another person is listening to a lecture, but he is thinking about how to shoot a swan in the sky with a bow and arrow. Although this person studies with that dedicated person, his grades are not as good as that person. Isn't his intelligence inferior to the last one? The answer is: no. Agree 607| Comment (7)