First of all, I would like to ask if the "compulsory warehouse opening system" you asked is "lightening positions". Because I have never heard of the saying of "compulsory liquidation system", in futures.

Second, if it is "reducing the burden", I found two definitions,/view/967253.htm.

/view/ 1060658.htm

It can be understood as follows: under normal circumstances, "liquidation" means that there is a huge loss in the transaction, and the customer's position will be liquidated if the margin cannot be added any more.

And "lightening positions" means that there are huge risks in the market and the exchange forces both parties to close their positions. In other words, this does not mean that losses should be flat and profits should be flat.

Third, explain that sentence, not necessarily right: according to the understanding of the definition of "lightening", give an example. For example, a trading product has a daily limit for several days, and today it has a daily limit of 5000. Then the exchange stipulates that the market will be closed today. If there are 1 0,000 lots waiting in line at the daily limit price, it is stipulated that this 1 0,000 lots should be distributed to those who bought positions (made money) before. Allocate according to the number of positions and the size of profits. In other words: whoever earns more money will be the first.

I wonder what my answer is.