What requirements should fund bidding meet?
First, scientific principles. Mainly refers to the topic selection and design:
1, with dialectical materialism as the guiding ideology, the topic selection must be based on facts, not subjective speculation; 2. Correctly handle the relationship between inheritance and development, and the topic selection should not conflict with the confirmed scientific laws and theories; 3, fully reflect the clarity and profundity of the applicant's thinking, the topic must be specific and clear.
Second, feasibility refers to the conditions for implementation. To meet the feasibility of scientific research projects, we must:
1. In addition to technical titles, applicants are required to have certain work experience and the corresponding research ability to complete the application subject; 2. The members of the research group are research teams with reasonable knowledge and technical structure; 3. The research work related to the application project has accumulated some preliminary work; 4. Basic working conditions and working hours are reliably guaranteed; 5, the applicant and each major member to participate in the research project shall not exceed two.
Third, the principle of efficiency.
The principle of efficiency refers to the possible benefits of expected results. The requirements for basic topics have theoretical significance and/or potential application value. It is required to have economic or social benefits for the applicant.
In order to ensure the scientificity, feasibility and efficiency of bidding, attention should be paid to:
1, the key to the success or failure of the fund application is to choose a good topic, half a year in advance, and one year in advance for those who have just entered the business.
2. The topic assigned by the boss is not necessarily a good topic. It is best to choose your own topic. How to establish a project should be the most important lesson for graduate students. After graduation, you will find that no one will show you any valuable topics. In the academic desert of China, you are the only one left.
3. A good topic is produced under the condition of profound understanding of the topic. Read a lot of literature, and don't forget to think while learning knowledge. When you find someone else's loophole, a good topic is not far from you.
It is better to choose the topic according to the problem, not the technology. When you find the problem, you find the topic. And holding new technology to find problems that can be solved is mostly ineffective, but there are still many people, such as RNAi.
5, emancipating the mind, divergent thinking, multi-party methods and multidisciplinary cross, generally more popular, easy to apply for funds, but can not be forced to cross for the sake of cross.
6. The subject of innovating new technologies and theories must have a certain theoretical and technical foundation, and it is best to have a working foundation. Without you, you'll have to make a patchwork. This is China, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China seems to hate castles in the air.
7. It is better to choose basic applied research than clinical application direction in clinical research.
8. Choose a field that you are familiar with and have a working foundation, and don't cross too far. You are stealing money. Remember, if you don't pretend to be an expert, the Natural Science Foundation won't give money.
9. The starting point of important scientific issues should be accurate, neither too wide nor too big, as long as it reflects certain new ideas and research value. The National Natural Science Foundation that can win the Nobel Prize will not give money.
10, a project that no one has done can't be used as the basis for setting up a project, but the project funded by the National Natural Science Foundation must be done by no one in the world, not a blank in China. Of course, if there is a similar result in the world, China people on the earth may not know it, but once it is discovered, you will die.