in p>215, the new housing provident fund policy did not stipulate that it must be tied with social security. If the company refuses to pay, it can negotiate with the company or report it to the labor department, housing provident fund center and other relevant departments, or it can bring a lawsuit to the court to ask the company to pay, but it cannot find an agency to pay it. Paying it is not in line with the Regulations on the Administration of Housing Provident Fund.

1. Articles 13, 14 and 15 of the Regulations on the Management of Housing Provident Fund in the State Council clearly stipulate that no matter whether the unit handles deposit registration, sets up a unit housing provident fund account, sets up a personal housing provident fund account for employees, or pays the housing provident fund normally every month, the unit should handle it. "Should" means "must" and "compulsory" in law. It can be seen that it is a legal and compulsory obligation and responsibility of the unit to pay the provident fund for on-the-job employees.

2. Paying the provident fund refers to an illegal act that the company fails to pay the provident fund for it due to personal reasons (freelancer, no unit, etc.) and wants to buy the provident fund, so that the agency (a company specializing in social security) can handle it on its behalf and buy the housing provident fund in its subsidiary company.

according to the relevant provisions of China's labor law and social insurance, employers should pay social insurance and housing accumulation fund for their employees after establishing labor relations with them. However, there is no labor relationship between the so-called "affiliated units" and individuals without units, which is suspected of forging labor relations. Moreover, social security and housing provident fund are benefits issued by the state to citizens or employees, and the state has invested corresponding subsidies, which has endangered the security of provident fund funds to a certain extent.