Chapter I General Provisions Article 1 These Measures are formulated in order to correctly grasp the funding direction of the Youth Marine Science Fund of the State Oceanic Administration (hereinafter referred to as the Youth Fund) and scientifically and fairly select the funded projects. Article 2 Supporting innovative research is the main purpose of projects funded by the Youth Fund, and special attention should be paid to discovering and protecting innovative projects in the evaluation. Actively support interdisciplinary research and pay attention to cultivating new disciplinary growth points. Article 3 The evaluation of youth fund projects shall be organized and implemented in accordance with the principles of relying on experts, promoting democracy, supporting the excellent and strengthening the strong, and being fair and reasonable. Article 4 The evaluation of youth fund projects shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures of preliminary examination, peer review, expert group review, comprehensive balance of the Science and Technology Department of the Bureau, and examination and approval by the competent leaders of the Bureau. Article 5 In order to ensure the fairness of the evaluation work, peer reviewers and members of the expert group shall avoid the unit where the evaluated person or his relatives belong. Chapter II Preliminary Examination Article 6 The Ministry of Science and Technology is responsible for the preliminary examination of the applied projects. In any of the following circumstances, it will be deemed as unsuitable for funding and will not enter the next evaluation procedure:

1, the application procedures are incomplete and the application form does not meet the requirements;

2. The members of the project team are mainly not young people;

3. The applicant does not have intermediate or above titles or master's degrees;

4. The project does not meet the scope of funding of the Youth Ocean Science Fund;

5. The technical indicators of the project are lower than the domestic similar research level or belong to repeated research;

6. The application funds are too high to be supported by the Youth Ocean Science Fund;

7. The project has obtained sufficient funds from other channels. Article 7 For projects that are not suitable for funding after preliminary examination, the preliminary examination opinions must be filled in and filed for future reference after approval by the company leaders. Chapter III Peer Review Article 8 Peer review is the basis for selecting projects and shall be implemented by the Ministry of Science and Technology. Generally, written comments are made through communication. Article 9 Choosing the right assessor is the key to peer review, and the selection of assessors shall follow the following principles:

1. According to the specialty and research content of the applied project, select the peer experts who are actually engaged in research work, have profound academic attainments, are active in academic thinking, are familiar with the domestic and international situation of the subject field of the evaluated project, have the ability of evaluation and analysis, are rigorous in study style and are impartial in handling affairs as reviewers;

2. When selecting reviewers, we should pay attention to their group structure, not only considering their professional counterparts, but also considering the coverage of knowledge and the representation of different academic viewpoints and different units;

3. For interdisciplinary projects, the professional structure of reviewers should include different disciplines involved. Article 10 In order to ensure the objectivity and fairness of the evaluation results, at least 3 peer experts are invited to evaluate each application project after it has passed the preliminary examination. Applications with similar contents should be reviewed by the same expert group as far as possible. Article 11 The assessors shall, with a serious and responsible scientific attitude, put forward specific analysis opinions on the scientific value, academic level, innovation and rigorous conditions of the assessed project, conduct the assessment in a realistic manner, and fill out the Peer Review Opinions on the Projects Applied by the Youth Ocean Science Fund of the State Oceanic Administration. Chapter IV Expert Review Article 12 The Ministry of Science and Technology selects excellent projects according to peer review and invites expert review teams to conduct centralized review. The number of key projects is not less than 65438+ 0.20% of the number of projects funded by the plan. And provide the application items and peer review materials that have not been sent to the expert review team for review. Thirteenth expert review group on the basis of peer review, review the application projects, according to the preferred support conditions and funding control indicators, put forward suggestions on funded projects and funding quotas. Fourteenth experts responsible for the project review, should carefully fill in the "State Oceanic Administration Youth Ocean Science Fund Project Expert Review Opinions", and signed by the leader of the expert group. Fifteenth expert review group should be established according to the following principles:

1. The expert review team is composed of bureau system experts, with team leader 1 name and deputy team leader 1 name, and the Science and Technology Office as the secretary.

2, the expert review team members to implement the tenure system, each term of two years, re-election shall not exceed three (six years), the number of each time is generally controlled at about one-third, in order to maintain the continuity of the work of the review team.

3. The members of the review team should have the position and title of researcher (or equivalent researcher); He has profound academic attainments, wide knowledge, democratic style, fair handling and strong comprehensive evaluation ability, and has time and energy to participate in evaluation activities during his tenure.

4. The members of the review team should give due consideration to the configuration of the professional structure. Chapter V Comprehensive Balance and Release Article 16 The Science and Technology Department of the Bureau shall, according to the suggestions of the expert review group, make a comprehensive balance, draw up the funded projects and amount plans, and report them to the leaders of the competent bureau for approval. Seventeenth approved projects, the science and technology department shall notify the applicant and the unit in writing, and send a copy to the planning department for funding procedures. Eighteenth approach by the Bureau of science and technology department is responsible for the interpretation of.