Who will treat Darwin's "infinite random evolution" hypothesis as "science"?

Since the fallen soul was instructed to take power in the air, fierce birds, wild animals and poisonous snakes have spread all over the world. They don't need to eat to keep warm, and they have strong adaptability. They can survive in any environment. If it is really "natural selection, the law of the jungle, the survival of the fittest", and which pests and beasts are far more "survival of the fittest" than human beings, then the earth is full of harmful insects, poisonous snakes and beasts. Because they are the "strong and the fittest" who can survive in any environment. For example, mosquitoes and fleas don't need sowing at all, even plants eat meat, and many extremely low-level insects and beasts kill people with chemicals. "Survival of the fittest" makes people have nowhere to hide. Then people are just uncomfortable and can't exist on the earth long ago. Is there anyone else in the world?

But the opposite is true. According to scientific research, it runs counter to "survival of the fittest": the world population was only1~ 20,000 in 654.38+0,000 BC, and it was only 20,000 ~ 30,000 years ago. According to the research data of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, it took 30,000 years for the paleolithic world population to double. By the beginning of AD, the world population had doubled, shortening to1000; By the middle of 15 century, the doubling time of the world population will be shortened to 15. 1830, the world population will reach the first 1 100 million; 1930 exceeded 2 billion; 3 billion in 1960; 4 billion in 1975; 1987 reached 5 billion; 1997 reached 6 billion! Every time the world population increases by 65.438+billion, the time required will be shortened to 654.38+000 years respectively; 30 years; 15; 12 years; /kloc-0 0 years! The train of the world population is speeding forward at an increasing speed. The report on the world population at the end of 2006 released by the United Nations Population Fund last year shows that the current world population has exceeded 6.56 billion. In China, which is still under the control of family planning, it is less than 2,000 days before April 1 989 "1/population day", and the huge population train has added1100 million passengers, reaching1February 6500.

Tigers are the strongest, but the reproductive rate is extremely low; Goats are the weakest, but their reproductive ability is amazing. It is not easy to get ginseng tonic; Farmers hate weeds, but they can't get rid of them Anyone with a little brains will find that the ecological world, whether insects or wild animals, has a particularly strong reproductive ability, which is a real biology that Darwin did not expect in the era of "the law of the jungle, the survival of the fittest" 50 years ago.

The male tiger's sexual organs are barbed, which will destroy his spouse's sexual organs after sexual intercourse, just like putting a chastity ring on his spouse so that he can't mate with other males before giving birth. Women's punishment is far more memorable than short-term pleasure.

According to the "evolution" principle of "natural selection", it has no ideology and selective random evolution, so other creatures in the world, including people, should have barbed male sexual organs. Why do they only grow on tigers that pose a threat to human beings?

Once the male tiger occupies this hill, he will eat the children born by other male tigers first, and can't accommodate the same sex to keep the offspring. If everything in the world is like this, how can we talk about reproduction Is this called "the jungle" or "the jungle"?

At present, there are about 3000 kinds of snakes in the world, of which only 600 kinds are poisonous snakes, and the sexual intercourse frequency and reproductive ability of poisonous snakes are far lower than that of non-poisonous snakes.

After being bitten by a poisonous snake, the venom entering the human body is only 0.0 1, which is fatal enough. This kind of poisonous snake can be captured alive by soaking the original poisonous snake in wine and detoxifying it.

No one in the coyote population has ever guided them, mobilized them and convinced them that "inbreeding is very harmful". ? Scientists have spent 10 years following up and proved that the animal kingdom without moral constraints can stop incest on its own. This driving force is there, and science has been unable to solve this mystery. Is it idealism? Can it be explained by "evolution"?

Science has found that only one of the 300 million human sperm is allowed to enter the egg, and the others are not allowed to enter. If Darwin's hypothesis of random "natural evolution" without destination is really scientific, then at least 654.38 billion sperm can be randomly "naturally selected" into the egg, then all people in the world are deformed.

According to? The evolutionary principle of "aimless and random" natural selection: harmful bacteria should be the fastest and most prolific in the gastrointestinal tract of digestive system; On the contrary, gastric acid can kill the most vital harmful bacteria attached to the surface of food, while beneficial bacteria live in the large intestine.

There are harmful bacteria everywhere in the world. Who has the ability to control them? But humans are born with immunoglobulin IgG gene. IgG gene produces a large class of immunoglobulins. Theoretically, there are as many as 654.38+08 billion kinds of antigens. Immunoglobulin is a specific antibody against external antigens, which have not yet come in (or even occurred). IgG gene has pre-stored the information of unknown antigen, and prepared the antibody preparation method to deal with it. This is incredible! Moreover, people may not encounter 654.38+08 billion kinds of antigens in their lifetime. Of course, this will lose the "natural selection" that can't be on the table in the true knowledge of the universe. Because it is information that didn't happen but had a role first, and "natural selection" has been used for a long time before it is preserved.

Darwin's theory of evolution (122) article: "Is it possible to form a new species just because of a small mutation of an individual ... it is hard to imagine that birds fly in the air just because of a small mutation of reptiles. In order to fly in the air, reptiles need many necessary changes: the forelimbs of reptiles should evolve into flying wings; The brain evolved to control wings; The bone is hollow inside, so you can lose weight. Just like a car, if you want to become an airplane, you have to make great changes from the appearance to the internal engine. It is hard for us to imagine that the above situation can be completed just because of the gradient. "

The article also admits that the last shortcoming of Darwin's theory of evolution lies in the contradiction between the fossils excavated so far and the animal textual research of the conclusions formed. So far, no intermediate fossils have been found in fossil research, which means there are still many unknown mysteries. ..... But so far, people haven't found a giraffe fossil with a middle neck. As long as we can't find the physical evidence in the middle of the evolution process, this mystery can't be completely solved, Darwin's "evolution theory" will be incomplete, and there will be objections and arguments. "

Tencent Technology News (Stegosaurus/Compilation) 20 10 One of the top ten unsolved mysteries of science, the article of top scientists: "The early signs about the origin of life seem very simple, and microbial life on earth can be traced back to more than 300 million years ago. No one knows how they appeared. The answers range from chemical reactions around undersea hot springs to reactions in rock formations. Diana, a cave biologist at New Mexico State University? Northup said:' Many theories about the origin of life have been put forward, but because it is difficult to prove or refute, there is no fully accepted theory, ... "

The article "The Evolution of Darwin" clearly states that Malthus' theory gave Darwin the ideas he needed. The influence of Malthusian theory on Darwin and Alfred, the founders of "Modern Evolution"? Wallace has an important influence. Darwin said in the book Origin of Species: "His theory is the application of Malthusian theory in a field without human intelligence intervention. Darwin was an admirer of Malthus all his life. " Call him a "great philosopher". Wallace called Malthus' works "... the most important book I have ever read" and said that it was "the most interesting coincidence" that he and Darwin independently developed "evolution theory" by studying Malthus' theory.

Darwin was also outspoken in his autobiography, occasionally reading Thomas 1838+ 10 month? Robert? Malthus's cruel book "Population Theory" (Ann? Essay? Open? That? Principle? Yes? Population) theory influenced and inspired his view of evolution ...; Malthus estimated that if it is not controlled, the population will increase rapidly. In his view, the main factors of population control are wars, famines, diseases and other disasters. In a word, according to this cruel statement, for the survival of some people, others must die. Survival means "eternal war". Evolutionists generally admit that Malthus made many contributions to evolution unintentionally. Malthus' thought on population is the basis of modern evolution. Malthus strengthened his observation of "struggle for existence" under the condition of "limited growth". Due to Malthusian theory, Darwin realized that the competition for survival occurred not only between species, but also within the same species.

The 42-page article in Darwin's theory of evolution clearly points out that Malthus's theory gave Darwin the ideas he needed. Real scientists are practical and realistic, and have publicly and clearly attached two illustrations of "Survival of the fittest". Just like a young man with a flat head, even his underpants are pulled down for you to see, and you insist on calling him a "little girl", what else can you do to make your eyes see the truth and shut up? Is this person really confused about what "science" means? What is "philosophy of struggle"? Is it true that modern literature can't even distinguish between "magic" and "science"?

Influenced by these thoughts, Darwin proposed that the strong and the fittest would win the struggle for survival. Marx wrote an inscription in his second edition of Das Kapital. Give it to Darwin. Call yourself an admirer of Darwin.

Engels, an outstanding politician in the world, highly praised Darwin's "evolution theory", especially the hypothesis that "human beings originated from apes" and made several important supplements to it.

In the 76-page article of Darwinism, Darwinism itself admits that it is "the necessity of the times"; With the emergence of capitalism and colonialism, "evolution" has become necessary. For capitalists who believe in capitalist free economy, "natural elimination", "survival of the fittest" and "competitive survival" are undoubtedly new weapons to fight against socialists who advocate the position of the weak and conservatives who don't like change. Darwin's "theory of evolution" provides a legitimate theoretical support for the exploitation of capitalist society and the rule of foreign powers over colonies.

A "biology" wrapped in the philosophy of political struggle caters to many people who have been longing for it for a long time. Pushed Darwin to a very respected "hero" throne. Evolution? It becomes an indisputable axiom without looking for more convincing evidence from logic, biology, archaeology or any other theory. This is a historical fact, even in today's Darwin leadership circle, real scientists are recognized.

Reference news February 2009 18 edition 12 Reprinted in Spanish newspaper Le Monde February 10 Malcolm? Hones's article clearly tells people: "Darwin rarely wrote scientific papers, but the Origin of Species is worth reading as a literary work." The article clearly points out that Darwin and Lincoln are both epoch-making politicians. The article said: "Darwin read the economist Thomas? Two years later, Matthews' book about human plundering resources for survival established the theory of "natural selection". "

Real scientists, who has paid attention to the fact that human existence has been changed by "apes"? Who can say that Darwin's "theory of evolution" is "science"

Obviously, Darwinism's "the law of the jungle, the survival of the fittest" is undoubtedly a great blow to the real biological science, and it is naturally a deadly enemy to the theological thought of moral concept and peace consciousness. Because it is not science at all, it completely changed the norms and direction of biological science, which was the need of the struggle situation of capitalism and colonialism at that time. So what caused China, a thoughtful man, to be so ignorant that he passed on the absurd philosophy of struggle as biology to this day?

Sadly, because of the popularity of the political circles needed for those years of struggle, it is inevitable that so many people who don't know the inside story will argue with others for "reason."

Reference: Xiaoshan Xinhua Bookstore sells the first episode of What am I?