Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Tian Tian Fund - Ye Tan: Whose shame is it that four famous Buddhist mountains in China have listed and circled money one after another?
Ye Tan: Whose shame is it that four famous Buddhist mountains in China have listed and circled money one after another?

Our era will stand proudly in the world with a new indicator, and refresh the historical record of China-four famous Buddhist mountains are gearing up, ready to be listed or already listed.

According to media reports, Putuo Mountain has set up a tourism development co., Ltd., which plans to go public within two years and has entered the preparatory counseling period for listing; Mount Emei was listed in October 1997; Jiuhuashan entered the A-share market for the third time this year; The listing of Wutai Mountain is listed as one of the important tasks by the government.

when you go public, you will have the opportunity to circle money, and then a steady stream of resources will flow to local finance and even personal pockets. Whether it is a religious place or a tourist attraction, it is a sharp weapon to circle money in the eyes of some people. Religion has been sidelined and become a part of the overall tourism assets, and its sacredness has given way to making money.

the integration of religious resources into the tourism chain mostly follows the same path, with the local government leading the establishment of state-owned or jointly funded tourism companies, and the integration of local tourism resources into the company, faithfully realizing the principles of relying on mountains to eat, relying on water to eat, relying on culture to eat, and relying on temples to eat.

Although the parties concerned have established a certain Chu-He-Han boundary in order to maintain the sanctity of religion. On June 5th this year, Liu Wei, deputy director of the First Division of the State Administration for Religious Affairs, made it clear that the Taoist temple is a place to meet the religious activities of religious believers and a non-profit organization, and opposed to packaging and listing. Once the local government has classified an island and several mountains as tourism assets, can religious resources still exist alone in overseas fairy mountains?

For example, the tourism development company established in Putuoshan has assets including Zhujiajian Island Tourism Distribution Center, Putuoshan Cableway Company, Putuoshan Bus Company, Putuoshan Passenger Transport Company, Putuoshan Auspicious Fragrance Factory and other tourism enterprises. According to the available data, the listing of famous Buddhist mountains is centered on tourism resources, and religious sites must be excluded from the assets of listed companies. Putuo Mountain has fifteen temples and temples, including Fusaiji, Fayu Temple, Huiji Temple and Ciyun Temple. How should these assets be divided among listed companies? If there is no religious culture, can local tourism assets still be attractive by relying on bus companies and ropeway companies?

let's look at another rule that is contrary to name and reality. According to the regulations, scenic spot tickets cannot be used as listed resources, which is to prevent the phenomenon of improving the performance of listed companies, constantly improving scenic spot tickets and treating tourists as Tang monk meat, but such regulations are difficult to cure.

according to the prospectus of Jiuhuashan Tourism in 29, in the passenger transport business, the tourist transport tickets in the scenic spot cannot be sold and priced independently, but are bundled with the scenic spot tickets, which are collected by the Jiuhuashan Management Committee in the form of tickets, and then settled by the management Committee and the company according to 19 yuan/person-time. In fact, for any tourist resource, tickets are the most important source of income, followed by tourists' food, clothing, housing and transportation, especially for traditional cultural and religious resources as tourist attractions, tickets are even more indispensable. The regulatory authorities stipulate that tickets cannot be used as resources, and travel companies can disperse tickets and hide them in other income. In this respect, it is the specialty of many intermediaries and companies.

internationally, traditional excellent cultural resources, such as museums and churches, which are public welfare, only collect tickets symbolically. For example, the suggested entrance fee for the Metropolitan Museum of New York is $25, and the note says in a begging tone: "In order to get enough support for the museum, we hope you will pay at the suggested price." It can be seen that people without money can not pay the original price of $25. In Yellowstone National Park, you can spend 2 dollars to visit for a week; All museums in Paris pass, 39 euros for two days, 54 euros for four days and 69 euros for six days, and the basic ticket for the Louvre is only 11 euros. Some places also give students free tickets during the summer vacation, completely realizing the principle of public welfare. The maintenance of some foreign religious and cultural natural resources is donated by social public welfare funds, which has achieved positive incentives for charity and public welfare.

At present, China can't completely solve the maintenance of cultural and historical sites by charitable funds, but some religious sites can already do this. At this time, religion, historical relics and tourism consumption should be completely separated, and it is stipulated that all the assets of tourism companies do not include religious places, not including tickets for religious places, but take the food, drink, housing and transportation of tourism companies as the main source of profit, whether it is mules or horses, exploiting religious resources or developing tourism, and pulling them out for a walk. Some people say that the listing of religious scenic spots has not packaged the religious core resources, which is very strange. Isn't the name of Leshan Giant Buddha and Shaolin Temple, which was once coveted, not the core resources?

On the surface, listing is to protect religious sites and cultural resources. When interviewed by the media, the relevant leaders of Xinzhou City, Shanxi Province emphasized that Wutai Mountain has two purposes: one is to use financial capital to achieve low-cost expansion, better protect development, and integrate other advantageous resources to turn it into wealth; The second is to promote the spiritual culture of Wutai Mountain through listing, push the tourism culture industry to the capital market, and make it spread further. However, with these people's understanding of religion, can it be reassuring to protect and develop religious places?

going public is to make money, make money, and make money again. The listing of religious sites is the shame of China's charity and public welfare, the shame of the stock market, and the violent impact on many people's spiritual homes.