Fund investment, although there is a chance to get higher returns, may also lead to losses. Especially when the market is bad or you buy a bad fund, you may still lose a lot. Can the following small series really solve the problem of filling the position? It is of great benefit to everyone. Let's have a look.

What methods can make the loss-making fund realize the solution as soon as possible?

The first method is to make up the position. This method is also commonly used by many people. By covering the position at a low level, the holding cost of the fund is reduced, and when the fund starts to rebound, the solution will be much faster.

However, there is a certain premise to realize rapid deployment in this way. First of all, you should have funds on hand to cover your position. This requires us to have a reasonable plan for the position when buying funds. At the time of the first subscription, especially when the fund valuation is high, it cannot be done at one time. Moreover, because it is difficult to predict when the fund will fall to the bottom, covering positions may not be completed at one time, and covering positions also requires position management.

Secondly, it depends on the reasons for the decline of the fund. If it is because the whole market is not good, it is feasible to reduce the cost by covering the position. Because the whole market is unlikely to be bad all the time, there will always be a recovery. However, if the decline of the fund is mainly caused by the fund's own factors, it is debatable whether it is suitable for covering the position, because at this time, the fund may not give us a chance to rebound and let us solve the problem. If there is no chance, you may lose more and more.

Fixed fund investment, which is often said in fund investment, is a strategy to level the cost of fund positions by constantly covering positions, but fixed fund investment will not only cover positions when they fall, but also cover positions when they rise. Therefore, if you invest in a fund with a fixed investment strategy, you don't have to worry about how to solve it as long as you don't encounter a long-term decline.

Can continuous replenishment really solve the problem?

Not necessarily. Only when the fund price rises to the investor's cost price will the investor untie the fund. If the fund price does not rise to the investor's cost price, investors can't untie the fund, and the fund's ups and downs are uncertain, so it is uncertain that the fund will definitely untie the fund. If an investor trades a fund and loses 20%, then the fund will have to rise by 40% to get rid of it.

When the average investor's fund loses money, it is a better operation mode to make up the position continuously, because it will reduce the cost. The lower the cost, the less risk investors will take. When the fund rebounds, investors are more likely to return to their capital or make money.

It should be noted that jiacang is based on the fact that the fund is a high-quality target. If the fund is not a high-quality target, it is better to replace other funds. The rise and fall of the fund is determined by the investment target. If the investment target goes up, then the fund goes up and the investment target goes down, then the fund goes down. Investors can add positions in batches, for example, the fund loses once 10%, then loses once 10%, and so on until the position is added. When the fund starts to rise, it will stop adding positions.

What is a cover-up?

Generally speaking, covering positions means that after buying one or more stocks, the stock price drops sharply to reduce the cost of holding each stock and continue to buy the stocks held. Replenishment seems simple, but there is a lot of knowledge in actual operation.

First of all, we need to know what is covering positions? Covering positions refers to buying the stock after the stock price is cleared, which is called covering positions.

The advantage of covering positions is to reduce the cost of positions, and the disadvantage is to increase the funds of positions. It is not necessarily a good way to solve the problem, but it is the most suitable way in some specific situations, and it is actually a passive strategy. There is no best way for the stock market, only the way that suits your actual situation best.