The evaluation season of the National Natural Science Foundation has begun, and Green Pepper is more concerned about what the evaluation experts value the fund most.

Expert A:

I feel that thinking is the most important (the research content of the selected topic, and the corresponding research scheme and thinking), followed by foundation (the possibility of achieving the expected goal of the project) and basic scientific research literacy (such as the standardization of each part of the application).

Expert b:

The principles of personal evaluation of the Youth Foundation are: first look at the research foundation, and the paper is basically hopeless; If there are 2-3 papers above the medium level, then look at the project carefully, the thinking is clear, the scheme is feasible, the research platform is complete and basically the same. I think the most important principle is to give money to young people who have the potential to do research well.

Expert c:

1. Book quality

2. Personal Foundation

3. Other resources that are difficult to quantify

Expert d:

First of all, you should have a clear idea, and then have a good working foundation. As an innovation, it may be more difficult for young people, because the status quo is not a big environment for innovation, let alone innovation. How many of them are really for national basic research? Most of them respond to the call of the school, take the fund to raise the title, and send papers to raise the title. It takes a long time to write an innovative paper. How many young people can do it? Many people would rather break an article into n articles than publish a big article unless he is no longer a young man and has a certain academic status.

Expert e:

Research foundation and innovation, but the research foundation of our discipline does not refer to double-digit articles and the like. Only 2-3 articles that are closely related to this topic and have a certain level of innovation are enough to illustrate the problem.

Expert f:

The key is that the research content is related to the key points in the field, and the technical route is feasible (this is innovation), followed by the research foundation, but if the foundation is not good, you can't put forward a good plan to solve the key problems in your own scientific research field, which is unified.

Generally speaking, experts attach the most importance to innovation and research foundation.