The specific position is determined by the CSI Index Company, which has nothing to do with the fund company and is not comparable.

In terms of index fund management, Huaxia and Yifangda are the strongest, because these two companies have been engaged in index funds for a long time, and the current index management scale is relatively large in the industry, and they are the first batch of ETF managers. I think Harvest is a little sorry, even today it doesn't have its own ETF.

At present, among the 15 Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 index funds (15, not the eight you mentioned), Huaxia 300 has the lowest rate, followed by Harvest 300.

The advantage of Harvest 300 lies in: as the first floor said, it was established early and has a good reputation.

Disadvantages are: fund conversion function is not supported (it is fund conversion, not "mutual transfer" described by Harvest. The two are different in nature, the former does not need to pay the subscription fee, while the latter does).

Harvest 300 fell much because it is a Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 index fund, and all the Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 index funds have similar declines, because their goals are the same, and they are all tracking the ups and downs of the Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 index.

As for whether it is appropriate now, you should understand that its trend is basically in sync with the stock market. If you can't speculate in stocks, you won't know whether it is suitable or not. And I never predict the stock market, so I have no comment.