Domestic natural duplicate checking is the same as paper duplicate checking, and the repetition rate is definitely not stipulated by the school. If the content of the thesis is regarded as plagiarism, it will be regarded as not being able to participate in the graduation defense or being disqualified from awarding the degree.
At that time, it was the most critical moment to write and revise the national natural application, and researchers were working overtime to improve the tender. In the process of natural application in China, the following behaviors must not be touched! Otherwise, it is likely to be considered as academic misconduct. If it is light, it will lose the opportunity to apply for the country for several years, and if it is heavy, it may be terminated. In recent years, the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Fund Committee and the Health and Health Commission have severely cracked down on acts that violate the integrity of scientific research. Don't touch the red line!
1. Plagiarism plagiarizes other people's applications
There are many application templates on the Internet, including national templates, provincial templates and previously approved project templates, such as the 973,863 plan.
In the process of writing, it is ok to refer to and draw lessons from it appropriately, but don't copy it on a large scale. Large-scale plagiarism will be detected by the national natural duplicate checking system, so don't take any chances. In 20021year, among the 39 cases of academic misconduct announced by the Fund Committee, many people copied others' applications and were finally dealt with.
2. Entrust a third party to modify the project application.
There are many training courses on China Nature Application Online. From the perspective of NSFC, researchers should not be encouraged to participate. It is not allowed if a third-party organization is involved in modifying the compensation application. In the past two years, the Fund Committee has investigated and dealt with a number of third-party applicants who participated in the revision of the application.
Suggest the applicant to modify the application form, find a tutor, find a good colleague, etc. Of course, keep it as confidential as possible.
3. Entrust others to write the application.
According to the regulations of the Fund Committee, it is also not allowed to entrust others to write on their behalf.
You can ask others to read it for you, but if you want others to write it for you, will you still apply?
4. Forge personal identification information, expert recommendation letters, etc.
Where signatures are involved, etc. , must be handled in person. If it is forged, it will involve academic misconduct.
5. Paper fraud
Before, some people forged papers and published information, which was naturally recognized by the state. However, after the incident, the project was cancelled and the applicant was processed.
6. Submit the application content repeatedly.
This is also easy to ignore. Although the Fund Committee did not investigate and deal with relevant cases, it is likely to involve academic misconduct.
The Fund Committee has made it clear that:
(1) Applicants are not allowed to apply for the same or similar projects with different project types, different applicants or different supporting units at the same time; Repeated application for funded projects is not allowed.
(2) Applicants who meet the limited application conditions in the current year should list the project types and project names of other projects applied for in that year when applying for projects of different science departments in that year, and explain the differences and connections between the applied projects.
For example, some applicants are not allowed to submit applications with the same or similar contents to both provincial and national nature.
According to the report of Marine Science 202 1 sponsored by the Ministry of Earth Sciences, the Ministry of Science believes that such behaviors may be investigated as academic misconduct.
In addition, in the process of project evaluation, asking for help and interfering with the evaluation are all suspected of academic misconduct, so you need to pay attention!