I personally think it's very good. If you have time, I highly recommend going to the cinema!
after all, the small screen and big screen effects are there, not to mention the movie is still on. Do you want to see the gun version if you don't go to the cinema? Not really.
I paid attention to the film project and looked forward to it. Before that, I saw Spider-Man 3 in 27, which involved the role of Venom. It's ten years since now. Although the plot has been almost forgotten, at least it is confirmed that the contents of the two films are almost different. It's impossible to talk about restarting the film, because it's a new story, so you don't have to worry about not understanding it.
This brand-new movie Venom still focuses on the origin of the characters. Although the film promotes "Marvel Comics's first villain's independent film", it is somewhat misleading to passers-by, but it is somewhat absolute to mislead passers-by, because Venom and the host are two consciousness, as long as both parties don't know each other, it must be a contradiction. How do you define him if one is good and the other is bad? In the cartoon, venom is set as a thinking alien organic life, which is basically active in a liquid form and needs to be combined with a life (host) to survive, that is, in this form (two life forms of life) can be called venom, which can give the host powerful strength and ability (such as the self-healing ability shown in the movie, which can be regarded as coming back to life). If the host is a good person, it can make the good person become a superhero, and if the combination is a bad person, it will make him a super villain.
Eddie Brock, the protagonist of this film, is also the most famous host in comics. In the first 37 minutes of the film, Eddie's failed life was shown to us. I even think this is the reason why the opening was badly reviewed. Such a long introduction of characters made most viewers who watched special effects movies with popcorn hearts sleepy. Perhaps passers-by didn't know that the reputation of Poison was really unbearable in North American rotten tomato film critics. What was remarkable was that the audience paid the bill and felt very good, and I was.
The current rotten tomato interface
In my opinion, compared with other Marvel Comics movies, it is also a small production. The action pictures are not surprising, but they are not so bad. I really like this narrative, and I also asked my friends who have just seen it around me, and they all said that it is quite good-looking, and the characters are fully displayed. We can see Eddie's character, regardless of the consequences, but also timid, just as Venom said, "Jump?" The comparison of "Fubao" shows the growth of the characters, and the interaction between them is particularly interesting. The simple and complete origin story is not all kinds of chivalrous people at first (referring to The Avengers, she fell asleep before watching it, indicating that the original film was a single film, which was like a TV series. It can only be said that the director made a choice in the characters, so that passers-by thought it was not a film, just watching special effects). Then I think those movies that said it was a poor plot in Marvel Comics, I can't bear to think about it.
At present, Venom is still on display, with a price of RMB 1.4 billion. We should watch it quickly. Forget Fantastic Animals 2, which is really not as magical as the first one!