Legal analysis: On April 2, 219, only five days after being approved, China Initial Insurance Foundation announced that it had expanded the assistance scope of "Key to Life-Cancer Immunotherapy Patient Assistance Project" for the first time, and announced the charity assistance scheme of Creda _ for lung cancer patients: for eligible patients, the assistance policy was 5+5 and 3+3. For cancer families who are deeply mired in the quagmire, high drug prices have always been a huge challenge that must be faced. The drug price of 3,-5, a year has made countless cancer families "hope for medicine". In order to solve this problem, the country and all walks of life are working hard. Creda _ For eligible patients (patients who are confirmed to meet catastrophic medical expenses), after five courses of self-use, the chinese primary health care Foundation can provide assistance for five courses, and the Foundation can continue to provide assistance for three courses of follow-up patients for every three therapeutic drugs, with a cumulative time of no more than 24 months.

legal basis: article 2 of the civil procedure law of the people's Republic of China, if the application of a party meets one of the following circumstances, the people's court shall retry the case: (1) there is new evidence enough to overturn the original judgment or ruling; (two) the basic facts identified in the original judgment or ruling lack evidence to prove; (3) The main evidence of the facts ascertained in the original judgment or ruling is forged; (four) the main evidence of the facts ascertained in the original judgment or ruling has not been cross-examined; (five) the main evidence needed for the trial of the case, the parties can not collect it by themselves due to objective reasons, and apply in writing to the people's court for investigation and collection, but the people's court has not investigated and collected it; (6) The application of law in the original judgment or ruling is indeed wrong; (seven) the composition of the judicial organization is illegal or the judges who should be avoided according to law have not avoided; (8) A person without capacity for litigation has not been represented by a legal representative, or a party who should participate in the litigation fails to participate in the litigation due to reasons that cannot be attributed to him or his agent ad litem; (nine) in violation of the law, depriving the parties of the right to debate; (ten) without a summons, the judgment is made by default; (eleven) the original judgment or ruling omitted or exceeded the claim; (12) The legal document on which the original judgment or ruling was made has been revoked or changed; (13) The judge has committed corruption, bribery, favoritism and malpractice, and perverted the law when trying the case.