They are all financial experts, and their main investment targets are equity and fixed-income products. What are the advantages of securities firms' collective wealth management products and fund products?
Brokerage financing charges are more flexible.
The management fee of open-end stock funds is generally 1.5%, as well as various subscription fees and withdrawal fees. Brokerage wealth management products are more flexible in cost. If CITIC Wealth Management No.2 is being issued, subscription fee, subscription fee and redemption fee will not be charged; Only 1.5% management fee and 0. 15% custody fee are charged, which is slightly higher than money market funds (0.33% management fee, 0.25% sales fee and 0. 10% custody fee). The management fee for investment promotion "fund treasure" is only 0.6%.
In addition, brokers can also agree with investors on other charging methods. Based on the market index, if the investment income exceeds the amount, the management fee shall be charged or agreed according to the investment performance. For example, Dongfanghong 1 does not charge management fees, but takes commission from the performance. Through these flexible designs, the fees paid by investors are more reasonable and generally lower than those of open-end funds.
Most of the financing of securities firms is guaranteed.
Because of the participation of securities firms' own funds, most of them have the nature of guaranteed income. Most brokers use their own funds to participate in the collection of wealth management products.
For example, Everbright Securities Sunshine 1No. and orient securities Dongfanghong 1 No.,the proportion of its own funds is10%; The participation ratio of changjiang securities Chaoyue Wealth Management 1 and China Merchants Fund Bao is 5%, and the highest is 1 100 million. Because of the participation of its own funds, brokers will take risks with investors. If there is a loss, it is also the first broker to lose money. Most equity funds do not have such a guarantee function.
The financial threshold of brokers is very high.
However, compared with funds, there are also some shortcomings in the collection of financial management by brokers.
First of all, the threshold for brokers to participate in collective financial management is relatively high, with a minimum of 50,000 yuan for limited products and 654.38+10,000 yuan for unrestricted products. The subscription starting point of open-end funds is generally 1000 yuan. Investment funds can be fixed regularly, which is suitable for long-term and medium-term continuous investment. The duration of general securities companies' collective wealth management products is 2 to 3 years.
Open-end funds have good liquidity.
More importantly, the liquidity of open-end funds is good, and the purchase and redemption cycle is generally 2 to 3 days, which can be realized at any time. Brokers must first go through a closed period of 1 month and 1 year.
Even during the opening period, the opening days of unrestricted products are relatively limited, usually 3 to 5 working days. Limited products can be opened every day on the open day because of their good liquidity. However, at the time of redemption, various restrictions such as "need to submit a written application" and "arrive within 7 working days" also discounted liquidity.
However, securities firms' collective wealth management products are similar to funds in product information disclosure, product scale, sales channels and many other aspects.
On the whole, the yield of securities firms' collective wealth management has been tested to a certain extent. It is possible that the yield of unrestricted products exceeds that of stock funds and that of restricted products exceeds that of money funds. Because the investment scope of securities firms' collective wealth management products is relatively flexible and small, there is relatively little interference from performance rankings and follow-up funds. However, the characteristics of poor liquidity and high threshold are inevitable. Therefore, securities firms' collective wealth management products are more suitable for investors with idle funds ranging from 50,000 yuan to 65,438+10,000 yuan, pursuing long-term stable income.
Private equity funds can also be called funds raised from specific targets. Compared with Public Offering of Fund, the first difference between them is the different ways of raising funds. In Public Offering of Fund, fundraising is public, while private equity funds raise funds in a private way, and it is not allowed to use any media to advertise. Secondly, the fund-raising targets are different. Public Offering of Fund faces an uncertain public, while private equity funds only raise a few specific investors. Third, information disclosure requirements are different. Public Offering of Fund has very strict requirements for information disclosure, while the requirements for private equity funds are much lower.