Recently, Fund Jun launched the list of middle and long-distance running funds in the past three years and five years, which attracted more attention. For fund investors, buying a fund should penetrate the fund manager behind each fund to choose, because simply looking at the fund performance is easy to be misled, because the fund managers of some funds have changed a lot, and the existing fund managers may not be the main performance contributors or have not served for a long time.

Therefore, judging from the actual choice of funds, today, Funjun specially launched the list of fund managers, and selected those fund managers who have managed funds for three to five years as the object of investigation to see which fund managers can stand out in the medium and long term.

I. Leading stock fund managers (in the past three, four and five years)

1, leading stock fund manager for three years (20 1 610/0/0/0/0 to 201September 30th)

Statistics show that among the fund managers who have managed a single fund continuously for three years, 32 stock fund managers have managed more than 50% of the active stock funds in the past three years, and most of them have good retracement control. Compared with their respective performance benchmarks, the excess returns are obvious, and they are at the leading level in the industry as a whole. Among them, Xiao Nan of E Fund, Liu Yanchun of Jing Shun Great Wall Fund and Zhang Kun of E Fund ranked in the top three.

2. Equity fund managers with leading performance for four years (20 15 10 10/0/to 20 1 September 30th)

Statistics show that 22 equity fund managers who have managed a single fund for four years have managed more than 73% of active equity funds in the past three years, and most of them have good retracement control. Compared with their respective performance benchmarks, the excess returns are obvious, and they are at the leading level in the industry as a whole. Among them, Xiao Nan of E Fund, Zhang Kun of E Fund and Liu Yanchun of Jing Shun Great Wall Fund ranked in the top three.

The latest list of China's best fund managers in three years, four years and five years is coming!

3. Equity fund managers with five-year leading performance (20 14 10 10/0/to 20 1 September 30th)

Statistics show that, taking fund managers who have managed a single fund for five years as the object of investigation, 22 stock fund managers have managed more than 1 10% of active stock funds in recent three years, most of which have well controlled their withdrawal, and their excess returns are obvious compared with their respective performance benchmarks, and they are at the leading level in the industry as a whole. Among them, Zhang Kun of E Fund, Lin Peng of orient securities Asset Management and Xiao Nan of E Fund ranked in the top three.

The latest list of China's best fund managers in three years, four years and five years is coming!

Second, the leading performance of pure debt and secondary debt fund managers (nearly five years)

1, pure debt fund manager with five-year leading performance (20 1 410/0/0/0/0/to 201September 30th)

Statistics show that 16 pure debt fund managers have managed more than 38% of pure debt funds in the past five years, which is obviously different from their respective performance benchmarks. Among them, Sunny/ Zhang Yajun of E Fund, Yin of Huafu Fund and Wang Li of Dacheng Fund ranked in the top three.

The latest list of China's best fund managers in three years, four years and five years is coming!

2. Tier 2 debt fund managers with leading performance in the past five years (20 1 41June1to 201September 30)

Statistics show that 15 secondary debt fund managers have managed more than 42% of secondary debt funds in the past five years, which is obviously different from their respective performance benchmarks. Among them, Guo Jun of Bosera Fund, Zhang Qinghua of E Fund and zhangqian of Guangfa Fund ranked in the top three.

The latest list of China's best fund managers in three years, four years and five years is coming!

During the National Day holiday, Qujun, as a professional asset management media, specially invited well-known domestic Public Offering of Fund managers, private investment managers and investment sponsors of securities firms to write articles in person, summarizing the stock market and bond market in the first three quarters, and analyzing the future capital market opportunities and investment layout, so as to make a reference for everyone's post-holiday investment layout. Today, * * * nine Public Offering of Fund managers contributed. What do they think of the market in the fourth quarter? Please see ~ ~

Chang Qian, Harvest Return Fund Manager:

Four-dimensional screening of high-quality companies, focusing on three major investment directions

With the closing of the market in September, A shares are still hovering in the continuous shock, and some excellent active equity funds have created rich excess returns for investors.

In harvest fund's GARP investment strategy group, the main investment goal is to find stocks that are undervalued by the market and have the potential for sustained and stable growth. We believe that buying high-quality companies at reasonable prices and holding them for a long time is an effective way to continuously obtain excess returns. The main foothold is that the company should be of high quality. When selecting stocks, we mainly pay attention to the company's texture, start from the company's fundamentals, earn money for enterprise growth, and focus on those companies with deep moat, which can continuously bring high returns and reflect relatively high ROE.

Generally speaking, the selection criteria of good companies are mainly based on four comprehensive considerations. First of all, the company should have a good business model and be able to continuously strengthen its competitive advantage over time; Secondly, to be in a good industry, this industry should have room for development, clear competitive pattern, obvious leading edge, or a concentrated trend in the industry; From the company's own point of view, it should have a significant competitive advantage, and the moat is deep enough for sustainable development; Finally, at the financial level of the company, it is necessary to reflect a relatively high ROE, because ROE reflects the company's competitive advantage, is the company's ability to truly create returns, and is also an important determinant of the long-term return rate of stocks.