Friend, first of all, the picture you posted should be the shareholding details in your brokerage stock software. The software used by various brokers is actually several mainstream softwares, plus a brokerage LOGO. They are all wrong when showing the cost of holding shares, especially after many dividends and share changes (share offering, share shrinking and share splitting) formed by long-term shareholding, the "cost price" given is often wrong, and this value is best calculated by yourself. Because there is an error in the value of "cost price", the realized profit and loss, floating profit and loss and profit and loss ratio calculated from this are all wrong. It is outrageous that these figures here have opposite profits and losses.

At the end of last year, 180ETF merged its fund shares at 4: 1 (note that it is a merger, not a split, you can check the fund announcement.

), that is, four old fund shares were replaced by one new fund share, and the corresponding net value of each fund also quadrupled. This requires a specific program, so you see a1313 "managed transfer out" on February 20th, just a program. You don't have to worry at all, and you don't need to do anything. He just made your fund share become a quarter of the original, but the net value of each share is four times that of the original, so the total market value has not changed at all, and no cash has been generated, so there is no saying that "the money will be gone when it expires".

Since the total market value of the funds you hold has not changed at all, your losses have not changed at all. Since the number of shares is only a quarter of the original, your "cost price" should be increased by four times accordingly. But mind you, your real cost price may not be 79 cents times 4. After investigation, the 180 ETF won three lots in 2009, and the cost price should be lower than the purchase price.