There is a great controversy about the importance of ability and education. Some people say that in the era of knowledge explosion, education is more important than ability, while others think that ability is more important than education. Therefore, in order to solve this problem, the activity department of the Youth League Committee of our school held a friendly match called "which is more important, education or ability" on the afternoon of April 5. The auditorium was packed with people and full of passion. Debaters from the Department of Self-taught Examination and the Department of Social Sciences entered the audience one after another, waiting for the chairman to announce the start of the contest. The competition was strongly supported by two departments. The dean of the department sat on the guest table early, and the judges were ready. The chairman announced the start of the competition and invited both sides to explain their views. First of all, the debater of the self-taught examination department will speak. Their view is that "ability is more important than education" and the presentation time is three minutes. After that, a debater from the opposing side (social science department) spoke. Their view was that "education is more important than ability" and the presentation time was also three minutes. This is the first part of the contest, and then enter the second part: the offensive and defensive part. In this session, first, a player from the other side asks the other side a question and then answers it. At the beginning of the contest, it was obvious that all the contestants failed to get into the state quickly and were still in a state of tension. By the third free debate, the contest reached its climax. In "On Liberalism", the opponent raised such a difficult problem: "The opponent thinks that ability is more important than academic qualifications, so I would like to ask: Do you want a diploma after graduation?" It is such a question that stumbles each other and makes them speechless and confused. In the question-and-answer session of the audience, the audience put forward a sharp question to the social science department: "If you are an enterprise manager, facing two graduates with the same academic qualifications, would you choose the one with strong ability or the one with weak ability?" This problem has brought the players in the social science department to a deadlock. At the end of the contest, both sides summarized and reiterated their views. Finally, the chairman decided the result of the contest according to the judges' scores, and the social science department won the championship. Yin Gao won the best debater in the second debate and Yang Zhaoming won the best image award in the third debate. The cheerleading teams of the two departments can be said to be "passionate, regardless of the outcome" in this activity. Before the game, the two departments made full preparations: banners, small red flags and small exhibition boards were distributed in every corner of the small auditorium, which was as lively as the contestants on the stage. At the end of the competition, Mr. Wang and Mr. Wang Huicheng were invited to summarize respectively. The competition was a complete success. Although "educational background" has overcome "ability", the society in 2 1 century still needs people with "both ability and political integrity". Let's work together to improve our own quality and create a harmonious society!