Well, after you have studied a lot of technical analysis, you will find that it's all nonsense, not as Nazi as naked K. Too many indicators are too messy, and all kinds of contradictory signals appear at the same time, which makes it easier to confuse yourself, make yourself stubborn, and have a greater probability of losing money.

Naked K is the fastest indicator in technical analysis. I don't believe you if you want to say how well you have learned in technical analysis. Therefore, people who know a little will simplify things, and naked K will be pleasing to the eye.

This is also the reason why Livermore despised Gann, a technocrat, and Gann went back to all kinds of rules that Livermore said when he died. All kinds of rules emphasized the importance of rules, but no longer mentioned technical analysis.

there are many ways and means of trading, and there is no qualitative difference between the results of a single one. Every tool has its limitations!

The best trading methods vary from person to person, and they solidify their trading system because of the observation of trading.

In the final analysis, except for ultra-short and ultra-high frequency, high probability traders are all morphological trend judgment plus naked K and indicators to provide signals for trading. Of course, pure fundamental traders are excluded here.

personally, we think that experienced traders prefer quantitative trading, but it is difficult to realize quantitative trading, especially if it is realized by programs and naked K .. There is no difference between all technical analysis methods, but the division of labor is different, some provide trend judgment, some provide trading signals, naked K seems to have both, futures and foreign exchange can be used, but there are thousands of stocks in the stock market, and that only tracks two or three hundred so-called industry leaders to observe with charts, but it is also very tedious and annoying, and how many people insist on it for a long time?

Of course, we can also reduce the number of individual stocks in an efficient way, but we can catch the stocks that may be at the explosion point or are in the process of rising in minutes by quantifying and setting our own indicators. Pure naked K can only be viewed one by one according to the increase, so I don't think that deep-seated traders now prefer naked K analysis, let alone this. Only quantification can further improve the winning rate in the case of technical analysis integration.

quantification? Looks like the holy grail? Unfortunately, there is no holy grail in the world, and if there is, it is not technical analysis! In fact, the holy grail may be your personal cultivation and a little luck.

there are three stages in understanding the EMA system: in the first stage, the mountain is the mountain, and Grambi's EMA law is the foundation. After a certain amount of experience, I began to dabble in structural analysis. In the second stage, I saw that the mountain is not a mountain, so I can cancel the EMA combination and look at the naked K, in order to see the structure more clearly, and then go forward, understand the spiral rule of blooming like a flower, and have a new understanding of the EMA combination, so it doesn't matter whether there is an EMA or not. The naked K moving average doesn't hinder your understanding of the life process. Your eyes only have the level and rhythm. This is the third stage: seeing mountains or mountains

There is no such thing as naked K in any technical school. Only a fool will believe that watching naked K can make money stably. Those who say that using naked K and using mobile phones can make money stably are full of address unknown idiots, and you believe that they are two idiots.

Without superior technology, you must study the fundamentals hard. . . I think naked K may be more influenced by the formula for senior traders. Of course, this formula is his personal subjective judgment and the intuitive subconscious generated by long-term stimulation. When a certain gesture appears, he can predict the general trend through the K-line indicating lagging information, and basically does not run.

However, if you can understand the general principles of financial risk control, and the disposal strategy of the country's hot money, you will know fairly well whether to stock.

you can compare what the market looked like ten years ago and what it looks like now, so you can understand the truth.

I am a rookie. Tell me what I have seen. I have come into contact with some professional traders in institutions. One of them is about 3 years old and manages 2 billion funds. People also look at the K-line directly. Why don't they use other indicators? I learned some knowledge about foreign exchange speculation from others. They answered this question in class. They don't know where the moving average is without using other indicators, such as the moving average. They feel trouble without using the moving average system. They take classes.

deep investors prefer quantitative trading to naked K-analysis. Ten years ago, the top ten funds in western countries were all non-quantitative transactions, but today, seven of the top ten funds are quantitative transactions, and the top six are quantitative transactions. Quantitative transactions have accounted for 5% of the western trading volume.

Look at the characteristics of successful people at home and abroad.

Stock market and futures involve massive data, and mathematical processing of data has natural advantages.

In today's world, big data analysis and artificial intelligence rise, and mathematical models become its core. Quantitative trading uses the above technologies in large quantities, which belongs to the technical analysis of indicators and has become the mainstream trading mode of hedge funds, with American mathematician Simmons as its model.

more than 1 years ago, only the last of the top 1 hedge fund management scales in the world was quantitative trading. Now, seven of the top 1 hedge funds are quantitative trading, and the top six are quantitative trading. Simmons, a first-class American mathematician, founded the Renaissance companies in the top four.

Even Buffett, in fact, has a very strong mathematical thinking ability.

In today's China, Wonder has selected the top three private equity funds in China, which are "Jiukun, Mingxun and Magic Square". It is no accident that these three companies happen to be quantitative trading private equity funds.

quantitative trading means trading with indicators, that is, establishing a mathematical model, testing the historical data well, and then you can make a firm transaction, and even the historical data can't pass, so failure is a high probability thing. Subjective trading is 1 times more difficult than quantitative trading, and quantitative trading is more reliable.

conclusion: the highest level of stock trading is "a stable profit model of quantitative trading, with an annualized profit of more than 1%, preferably more than 2%. The maximum withdrawal control of risk control is excellent, and the strategic capital capacity is also very important".

Buffett's annualized rate of return is about 21%.

that's a feeling! ! ! Commonly known as the sense of disk! !

only the price change will cause all other changes, only the price, others are caused by the price, so what do you think should be studied?

naked k, original flavor. The moving average and other indicators are artificially added with the so-called "law", which has certain reference. The real thing is to participate in the long-short game and mentality of related factors, and everything else is a beginning!