Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Tian Tian Fund - It’s a political question. Let the experts solve it.
It’s a political question. Let the experts solve it.

First, we have to distinguish between "fair" and "average."

Eating "averagely" from a large pot has been proven to hinder the explosion of individual capabilities and the improvement of efficiency.

"More work, more gain" has been proven to be an effective measure to improve efficiency.

There will naturally be income gaps. People have different abilities and social contributions, so there should be differences in income.

Like our nature, if there were no terrain differences, there would be no vibrant waterfalls.

However, too large a gap is also a problem that must be solved.

The law of nature is: the higher the mountain, the easier it is to be eroded, and the lower the valley bottom, the easier it is to be filled.

In short, although internal forces in nature make the earth's surface increasingly rugged, external forces continue to chip away at mountains and fill valleys.

Therefore, our society should indeed have a mechanism to reduce the income gap.

For example, the sound donation and tax system in the United States has enabled Americans to make total charitable donations of US$260.28 billion, and donations of more than US$100 million have become increasingly common.

Of course, a prosperous country and a strong people are one of the reasons for the increase in total donations, but the importance of the system cannot be ignored.

Although we cannot copy the measures in the United States, there are still many things we can learn from. Specific measures include: tax deductions for donations. Americans have such a high enthusiasm for charity. On the one hand, it is related to their cultural traditions based on Christianity. Many

Rich people agree with Carnegie's famous saying: "It is a shame to die rich." They all regard giving back to society and helping the poor as one of their obligations and moral requirements.

On the other hand, it is also thanks to the fact that the United States has a legal environment that is very conducive to the development of philanthropy.

The establishment of charitable funds by wealthy American families not only fulfills their social responsibility to take care of disadvantaged groups, but also brings huge gains to the wealthy.

Tax benefits are attractive to the wealthy.

The inheritance tax and gift tax in the United States are famous for their high progressiveness. When the inheritance is more than 3 million US dollars, the tax rate is as high as 55%, and the beneficiary of the inheritance must first pay the inheritance tax before inheriting the inheritance, so the descendants of the rich must inherit the inheritance.

There will be many obstacles.

If you establish a foundation or make a donation, you can get tax deductions, and the amount you donate will be deducted from your income tax accordingly.

Making charitable donations can not only reduce losses, but also help establish a public image and create a role model effect.

In addition, the state also provides a large number of tax exemptions and tax reductions for the operation of foundations, allowing charitable foundations to obtain high returns that other enterprises cannot match.

At the same time, charitable donations can also allow family members to continue to control the use of wealth.

Like Buffett, many American families involve their children in their philanthropic programs, through which they teach their children how to manage wealth and instill in them values ??such as generosity and giving.

For example, some families allow their adult children to sit on the board of directors of the family charity foundation, or allocate funds to establish a separate fund for them, allowing them to allocate the funds in the fund to different areas.

In terms of wealth, both Buffett and Gates would rather donate money to society than let their children squander it.

Buffett also dismisses the concept of hereditary wealth, likening those who grew up in a wealthy environment to "members of the lucky sperm club."

Gates also once said: "When you have 100 million US dollars, you will understand that money is just a symbol, it is simply meaningless." At the same time, he announced that he would not leave a lot of money to his heirs.

Donate by yourself and take care of yourself. In the United States, donating money is just the beginning of charity.

Donors can participate in the management of donations through a range of means to ensure that they have the greatest impact.

Over the past 10 years, the rapid growth of wealth has given birth to donors’ desire to directly participate in donation management. Donors (many of whom are young technological elites) have begun to put forward higher and higher requirements for the reliability and operational efficiency of charitable funds.

A few years ago, Wilko, a professor of microbiology at New York University, made a fortune from inventing an effective anti-inflammatory drug, but he gave away most of it.

He established a family foundation with current endowments of about $15 million, and last year donated a portion of future royalties from the drug's sales to the New York University School of Medicine, a donation estimated to be ultimately worth $105 million.

Wilko, 73, said that in addition to enjoying tax benefits, another reason he chooses to donate during his lifetime is that when he donates to large institutions and establishes some basic principles for the use of funds, he can oversee the use of funds.

In the United States, establishing a charitable foundation is equivalent to establishing a commercial company, and they are generally non-profit organizations.

Like companies, charitable funds can also engage in business. The income from operations is used as part of the appreciation of the fund, and part of it is used for various expenses.

U.S. law classifies these funds and requires them to publish their financial income, expenditures and operating status in accordance with regulations, and donors have the right to obtain such statements.

If some charitable funds are well run, it will be easier for them to receive donations.

Otherwise, it will be difficult to raise donations, and it may even be impossible to run the project.

Like all commercial companies, there are also a number of consulting companies active around the fund. They provide various suggestions to the fund and help the fund develop healthily.