Our building is multi-storey, with the highest six floors, and one staircase with two households, so each unit has 12 households. The building is the dormitory of the provincial government, so solar water heaters will be installed collectively after completion, of course, all on the roof. The upper and lower pipes all go down from the toilet.
A few years ago, everyone lived in peace, but ten years later, someone sold the house and moved away, and the new residents became neighbors, one after another. But the solar energy on the roof has become more and more problematic with the passage of time, and some have begun to run.
My home is on the fourth floor, so all the pipes below the fourth floor pass through my toilet. Suddenly one day, the pipeline on the second floor leaked, but the leaking joint was on the fifth floor, so my home became water curtain cave and I found the third floor. Finally, the second floor connected the pipe from the outside.
Now the water pipes on the first floor and the second floor are leaking into my house, but the impact is not great, so we told the first floor that it was not his house, and the second floor said that the water pipes in my house came from the outside and were not mine. So let's hurry up and see if ours is missing, and it isn't. Later, residents on the sixth floor said that, like water curtain cave, the solar water heater on their roof must be broken, and they couldn't find the owner after searching for a long time. There is no solar water heater on the third floor and no one lives on the fifth floor. It may be from another unit. I only see a puddle seeping down from it every day. Anyway, it's just rented and the furniture is not my own. There's nothing in the main toilet, so that's it.
He once asked about the property and didn't reply. I guess nobody cares, so he simply doesn't think about it himself. First, who owns the solar energy and who will repair it. In addition, the waterproof layer of the roof is obviously not done well, otherwise this kind of thing will not happen.
Is the public part of the property maintenance fund or the money shared by the owners? Nobody wants to get into this trouble.
I bought the last set on the top floor of the community and only lived in it for a few months. One wall of the small room was seriously flooded, and then it was found that the hall was leaking! Finding a dealer can't solve the problem! Because when the roof was repaired, the drain pipe was too high to be discharged on rainy days. After a long time, my wall was flooded! In any case, I can't build a shed on the top floor to dig water, and I also solved the housing problem of my sick and unemployed brother by the way! But he doesn't accept it. It's hot in Leng Xia in winter for iron houses! In order to recover the loss, rent it out to recover the cost! It's true that you don't buy a penthouse if you have money! ! !
Answer this question. Theoretically speaking, the roof of residential area must belong to public space, but in reality, it will easily become the personal space of the top residents.
Some young people like to buy penthouses for two main reasons. One is that the top floor is cheap, and the other is that the top floor provides more space.
Because it is most convenient for users who live on the top floor to go to the top floor, they certainly go the most, and over time the top floor has become their private space.
Many people don't like buying a penthouse. In addition to the cold or hot top floor, there is another very important reason that the top floor is prone to water leakage. When the roof leaks and there is no way to activate the property maintenance fund, the top-level residents will definitely hope that everyone will chip in to share the maintenance costs.
But it is difficult to collect money from other residents when they really want to collect money, because the rain on the top floor has no effect on them, and they feel that the top floor has nothing to do with them.
In fact, the roof is a part of * * *, because it is an indispensable part of their building, so the top floor belongs to everyone * * *, and every household has the right to use the top floor and the responsibility to maintain it. For example, the top floor belongs to the top floor, so people on other floors have no right to install solar water heaters on the top floor. In addition, it is precisely because the top floor belongs to * * *, so the maintenance of the top floor can enable the property maintenance fund.
However, in real life, few people will compete for the right to use the roof. Generally speaking, the passage on the roof is property management, and not everyone can go up casually, which is also for safety reasons.
Whether the roof of the residential area belongs to all the owners or the top-level owners cannot be generalized. It depends on how the developer plans the roof when building a house.
If the developer has planned the building with terrace on the roof when planning the construction project and obtained approval, then the sale or gift of this part of the building to the top-level owner should belong to the top-level owner.
If the developer does not plan the roof when planning the construction project, it is only the spontaneous behavior of the top-level owners. It is illegal to build pavilions and houses on the roof, and the roof should be shared by all owners.
Therefore, it mainly depends on whether the building on the roof is outside the planning or within the planning. The planned building has its own property right certificate, which can determine the ownership, while the unplanned building has no property right certificate, so it is illegal for the developer or the top-level owner to build the building privately.
First of all, the problem involved in this question is generally the contradiction that a person can go to the top. Other sloping roofs and uninhabited roofs generally do not have such disputes over ownership.
Secondly, this kind of dispute is very common, and most communities have this kind of dispute. The key issue of the dispute is that the ownership of the roof is unclear or illegal.
Finally, let's see who owns the roof.
According to the surveying and mapping rules related to real estate, pool and public area, unless otherwise agreed, it is generally shared by all owners by default; If there are other agreements on public use, such agreements shall prevail. So, whoever owns it is invited to see the contract. At the same time, not only the top floor tenants, some developers only agreed that the roof belongs to the top floor for the top floor tenants, but did not make the same agreement for the entire owner, resulting in more contradictions!
By way of digression, if the roof has no other purpose, it is suggested that it can be used for the top floor. In this case, there will never be an embarrassing situation that "maintenance is difficult to sign and everyone can use it".
I also live on the top floor. I agree that the top floor should be used by the top floor residents. The reasons are: first, we must sign an agreement with the owner and the property. If I use it, I'll fix it myself if it leaks. Of course, force majeure factors, such as war, earthquake and flying saucer, should be excluded. Without the contribution of anyone else. The advantage of this is that we won't have to argue about maintenance fees in the future. Plant some flowers and plants upstairs, never plant tall trees, never build a sunshade beyond the guardrail, and never let others interfere in order to achieve the best peace. I have a relative who lives on the top floor. There is heavy rain outside and light rain inside all the year round. It has been like this for many years, and the cost is tens of thousands. I want to find property management, saying that it is none of their business to find a developer, saying that the house has been delivered for more than ten years, and asking the residents in the same building to use overhaul fund without signing. And the top floor is full of solar water heaters, and there are always people building, installing and repairing them. There is a problem and it can't be solved. If my house and the top floor are used by everyone, they should be maintained. If I don't maintain it, I'll find someone to remove the things on it and sue to the court for a ruling. The viewpoint is not necessarily correct, and it can be discussed.
All owners of the community have * * *! ! !
In the past, the developers obeyed, and the roof belonged to * * *, but the problem of water leakage on the roof became more and more exposed, which made it difficult to sell the house on the roof!
At present, the new houses built by developers can only be promoted by buying houses and sending them to the balcony on the roof. But the balcony is still charged, but there is no property right, only invoices and use rights. This kind of behavior is illegal in law.
Many owners build buildings on the roof after buying a house, which has great hidden dangers.
If you can't see the past, you can report it. Everyone knows that every community has an accurate urban management.
This problem is actually a problem out of nothing. Theoretically, the first floor and the second floor are * * *, but in fact, the first floor can't be a * * * building and it can't be a * * *. If you look at your house on the first floor, you will clearly write down all your areas, but can you use it? You can't * * * enjoy the first floor as a house, nor as a shop, and so can the building, no matter what the developer signs with you. It's hot in summer, will you solve it with him?
There is no doubt about it. The roof belongs to all residents. Last year, a company developed and used a roof and called the police to restore it to its original state. Let's open it. Then you have to pay for it. The family took advantage of the early warning and dismantled it themselves.
Our community has developed the habit of barbecue at this time, that is, going to the roof to see the scene, and the smoke will not affect anyone. AA system.
At night, the twilight is boundless, and people who come here want to possess it, so they have to play tricks.
Does the person who asks this question have an eye disease?
According to some logic, the top floor is a part of the building and belongs to the public. So, are the first floor and above the foundation all part of the building?
Are they all public? You said you paid. Sorry, you only bought space, including walls and walls that form part of the building?
I didn't even ask when I was asked to pay for repairs, for fear of spending more money.
The sun is baked like a steamer in summer, and it is as cold as icehouse in winter. The electricity bill for air conditioning is two or three times more than others. Should it be split equally?
Please, don't do this, okay? Let's put ourselves in other people's shoes.
Otherwise, the roof of the top floor residents leaked rain, and they could not apply for the maintenance fund. Everyone was unwilling to pay the maintenance fee, so they stopped repairing it (going out to rent a house) until the wall collapsed. How many people will say?
Egoism, who wouldn't?