There are many ways to report:

(1) You can report directly to the local People’s Procuratorate, which is also the agency that directly investigates corruption crimes;

( 2) You can report to state-owned enterprise discipline inspection and supervision agencies, such as the Discipline Inspection Team of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection in the enterprise;

(3) You can report to state-owned enterprise management agencies;

(4) You can report to the local Anti-Corruption Bureau.

"Criminal Law":

Article 271: Personnel of a company, enterprise or other unit who take advantage of their position to illegally appropriate the unit's property as their own shall If the amount is relatively large, the person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention; if the amount is huge, the person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years and may also be subject to confiscation of property.

If a person engaged in official duties in a state-owned company, enterprise or other state-owned unit and a person assigned by a state-owned company, enterprise or other state-owned unit to a non-state-owned company, enterprise or other unit to engage in official duties commit any act in the preceding paragraph, he or she shall be punished in accordance with the preceding paragraph. Conviction and punishment are provided for in Articles 382 and 383 of this Law.

Extended information:

"Criminal Procedure Law":

Article 18: The investigation of criminal cases shall be conducted by the public security organs, unless otherwise provided by law.

Corruption and bribery crimes, dereliction of duty crimes by state functionaries, crimes that infringe upon citizens’ personal rights through illegal detention, torture to extract confessions, retaliation and frame-up, illegal searches, and crimes that infringe upon citizens’ democratic rights by state agency staff using their powers Crimes shall be filed and investigated by the People's Procuratorate.

For other major criminal cases committed by state agency staff taking advantage of their powers, when they need to be directly handled by the People's Procuratorate, the People's Procuratorate may file the case for investigation upon the decision of the People's Procuratorate at or above the provincial level.

Private prosecution cases shall be directly accepted by the People's Court.

Case:

To implement the task of comprehensively and strictly governing the party, state-owned enterprises are particularly urgent.

Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, as the anti-corruption campaign has deepened, some state-owned enterprise executives who violated disciplines and laws have been investigated and punished. As of November 24, the “Disciplinary Review” column of the website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Ministry of Supervision had published news that 171 state-owned enterprise executives were under investigation or punished. Behind these cases, some serious issues deserve attention.

We must keep an eye on the "key few" who hold important positions

"Some leaders set up affiliated companies to transfer interests around the business" "Some leaders and personnel in key positions engage in power, money, and "Power and sex trading" and "some corporate leaders manipulate the approval power to obtain corruption' black gold"...

In the feedback of the Central Inspection Team to central enterprises since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the word "leadership" appears frequently, only In 2015, the first round of special inspection feedback occurred more than 85 times, warning leaders of state-owned enterprises of the seriousness of the integrity risks.

The cases published in the "Disciplinary Review" column fully confirm this judgment. Among the 171 dismissed state-owned enterprise executives, 104 served as chairman, general manager, or party committee secretary, accounting for approximately 61% of the total.

Among them, they are mainly top leaders of secondary companies, but there are also Song Lin, the former Party Secretary and Chairman of China Resources (Group) Co., Ltd., and Xu Jianyi, the former Chairman and Party Secretary of China FAW Group Corporation. The main person in charge of an important state-owned enterprise.

“The power of the top leaders of enterprises is relatively concentrated. If supervision and control are not strict and effective enough, they can easily become a wild horse and slide into the abyss of corruption, misappropriation, and power-for-money transactions.” Hunan Provincial Law Society Integrity Professor Deng Lianfan, leader of the legal research group, said.

The risk of being "hunted" is high for top leaders, and other members of the leadership team and staff in key positions cannot be ignored. During the inspection, the Central Inspection Team found that because these people have the right to manage and dispose of corporate resources, assets, and funds to a certain extent, they are also easy targets for criminals to "hunt".

Zhang Zheying, the former deputy chief engineer of Metallurgical Corporation of China, took advantage of his position to obtain huge project funds for himself by inflating the project volume.

There are many such cases. Among the 171 dismissed state-owned enterprise executives, there were ***52 deputies and other team members, accounting for approximately 30% of the total; ***15 were responsible for key positions, such as chief accountants, office directors, etc., accounting for approximately 9% of the total. .

Through these cases and figures, it is not difficult to understand the good intentions of the inspection team in recommending that state-owned enterprises "formulate a list of powers and responsibilities, delineate the scope of power operation, and strengthen supervision and restriction of key positions and key positions." Be careful.

We must intensify supervision in key areas

The report of the Fifth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Commission for Discipline Inspection emphasized that it is necessary to improve the supervision system of state-owned assets and resources and strengthen the supervision of centralized power, capital-intensive, and Supervision of resource-rich departments and positions.

Behind this assertion, there is sufficient data and facts to support it. Most of the 171 dismissed state-owned enterprise executives come from the fields of energy, communications, transportation, finance and other fields.